" Drummer Cafe has really come to represent the best of what I believe the web can bring to the drumming community. "

David Crigger




Bookmarks

Add to: Facebook Add to: Windows Live Add to: Digg Add to: Del.icoi.us Add to: Reddit Add to: Jumptags Add to: Upchuckr Add to: StumbleUpon Add to: Slashdot Add to: Netscape Add to: Furl Add to: Yahoo Add to: Blogmarks Add to: Diigo Add to: Technorati Add to: Blinkbits Add to: Ma.Gnolia Add to: Google
Drummer Cafe Community Forum
November 18, 2008, 10:01 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: The Next Generation of Instructional DVDs.
 
   Home   Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: GEAR REVIEWS (by members)  (Read 8381 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
NPYYZ
Bronze Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 131



« Reply #20 on: March 31, 2008, 01:35 PM »

I've been playing the Yamaha DTXTREME ll E-kit since early 2006. Friday March 28th 2008 I picked up a set of the new DTXTREME lll's. While I was very happy with the sounds on the DTX ll kit I could always tell is was an E-kit, that is not the case with the DTX lll's.

Yamaha has improved the kick pad, the Hi-hat controller and the cymbal pads. All have a very realistic feel now. The drum sounds are samples of acoustic kits and let me tell you they are the best I've heard. Before I made this purchase I played the both Roland TD 20 and the DTX lll kits. While I felt the Roland kit was very impressive, the Yamaha sounded much better to my ear, and the Yamaha kit can do so much more.

I've been playing this kit practically non stop since Friday and it has performed flawlessly. With the DTX ll kit I would occasionally get a miss trigger every now and then, especially when I would hit the kick and snare at the same time. No such problem with this kit. Everything triggers perfectly, even very quick hi-hat patterns all trigger nicely.

I've barely scratched the surface as far as programming goes. I have programmed 3 kits so far all using the Oak Custom kit as a starting point. There is quite a bit you can do as far as programming goes, I've only tweaked the snare and kick but I pretty much have any drum sound I want available to me.

I bought the DTXTREME lll standard kit with includes the plastic rack, 1-3 zone snare pad, 3-3 zone tom pads, 2-3 zone cymbal pads, kick pad and hi-hat. It also comes with a hi-hat stand and a snare stand, 3 tom mounts, 2 cymbal arms and of course the DTX lll module.
The price for this kit was $3199.99

The special kit comes with an additional tom and cymbal pad as well as the new Hex Rack system. I originally was going to get this kit until I discovered how much I would have to spend on additional clamps to mount my existing pads on the rack, so I went with the standard kit.

The Special it sells for $3999.99

The DTX lll module has 4 extra inputs so instead of combining my DTX ll module with this one I just added 4 pads from that kit.

So far I give this kit a 5 out of 5. I've logged about 16 hours playing time so far and it has performed flawlessly.


You can check out an on line demo here:
http://www.dtxperience.com/dtxtremeIII.php   just click on video clips

Here's a few pic's of my set.





Logged
Nathan
Cafe VIP
Silver Member

Online Online

Posts: 453


Drums and Marine Biology


WWW
« Reply #21 on: May 01, 2008, 07:39 AM »

Sonar Home Studio 6


I recently upgraded to Sonar Home Studio 6, a stripped down DAW based on the Sonar 6 engine.  I'm liking what I see so far.

Why Sonar?  I'm not ready for everything that Pro-tools has to offer, and I'm not set up to run a Pro-tools friendly rig.  I'm a PC user, and Cubase seems to cater to the Mac users.  Lastly, all my project files are in Sonar's format Smiley.

Install
Install and Registration went very smoothly.  I was able to register the program online, and they promptly e-mailed my activation code.  Once the install was over, the very first thing the program did was import all of my global options from the old version of Sonar.  It was one of those "You had me at Hello" moments.  It then scanned my VST plugins folders, and fired itself right up. 

Differences
Upon opening one of my project files, I received an error message.  It wasn't a big deal, but previous muted sections of the project had been un-muted upon import.  It's a little frustrating, because I now have to go through and make those changes again.   Other than that, the layout is very similar to the full versions of Sonar.  In fact, with some of the features removed, it opens up a lot of screen real estate. 

I am now limited to 64 tracks.  Horror of horrors.   I really don't see that being an issue.  Home Studio doesn't have  of the fancy software synths that come with a full version of Sonar.  I don't need those at this point in time.

What I get
For under 100 dollars, I get a sleek DAW that I know will perform well from past experience.  I get the ability to freeze tracks to save on system resources.  I can export projects into a flash player that can be posted on a web site or a myspace page (really cool...I think).  I get that wonderful Cakewalk midi functionality for my e-drums.  I can create loops and groove clips.  It has a metronome!

If you want a little bit more, you can go for the XL version.  It's about 50 dollars more, and you get an extra sample package, another software synth, a drum sequencer, and a Peak Limiter plugin.  I didn't need any of those things, so I went with the normal version.

I'm happy with it.  It does exactly what I need, and it didn't break the bank.  I'm about to fire it up and record my drum solo  Grin

Your friend in the digital age
Nate

edit:  My only gripe so far is that they removed the Track Layers feature, which allowed you to edit multiple takes within a single track.  Now, I have to bounce each take to a new track, in order to edit them together. 
Logged

Yer off the edge of the map now, mate. Here there be monkeys on crack!

Music is The Best!
~f.z.

What would John Galt do?
The Architect
Bronze Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 142


« Reply #22 on: June 01, 2008, 07:17 AM »

The set used for the evaluation is a PDP CXR maple kit with a 12" rack and 14"/16" floor toms. The goal was a "modern Bonham" sound.

The coated VIntage A's on the toms were very nice. I used what I had available on the reso side. Paired with a clear ambassador on the 12", it was full and round with a nice long sustain.

On the 14"/16" toms they were paired with Evans clear G1's. The batter heads were equally full and round. The sustain was was a tiny bit more muted and has less highs. This was very likely due to the different reso heads on the floor toms.

Overall I like the Vintage A's. When its time to replace them though I would probably consider regular Ambassadors as I think the modern single ply version sustains a bit better.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC | Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.085 seconds with 20 queries.

Copyright ©2001 - 2008 Drummer Cafe. All rights reserved.
developed by Bart Elliott | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Site Map