funkster
Copper Member
Offline
Posts: 110
I love the Drummer Cafe!
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: August 24, 2004, 07:12 AM » |
|
I think I need a clarification at that point : what the difference between Gladstone and Stone technique ?  OK. Hopefully this will be my last post on the subject. Although Gladstone, Stone and Moeller all had their own approaches to technique they undoubtedly shared many concepts. Nonetheless, in today's world we've come to equate the Free Stroke with Gladstone and/or Stone, and the whipping motion with Moeller. I'll quote Dom Famularo's book 'It's Your Move', because he has studied with BOTH Morello (I.e. Gladstone/Stone/Free Stroke)and Chapin (Moeller). On page 10 of his book, refering to the Free Stroke he states: "The basic idea was established by the great teachers George L. Stone (author of Stick Control) and Billy Gladstone in the early part of the twentieth century."
Dom then goes on for about 5-6 pages describing the Free Stroke and exercises to develop it. If you want a complete description of the Free Stroke (aka Gladstone or Stone) read the lengthy description in Dom's book, refer to the Vic Firth website for Dom's video clips, and read Tiger Bill's explanation of the Free Stroke/Gladstone in his 3 part series 'Building Monster Chops'. Now on page 16 of Dom's book explaining the Moeller stroke he states: "The Moeller Stoke is a whip stroke (emphasis mine), that while feeling relaxed and smooth, creates a great deal of energy when played. It builds on the the relaxation and rebound learned in the Free Stroke, so I recommend that you learn the Free Stroke first."
Dom gives a very clear synopsis of the Free Stroke and attributes it's formal origins to Gladstone and Stone. He then gives a good overview of the Moeller Stroke, explaining it as the whipping motion and defining it as a separate technique from the Free Stroke, but one which builds on the concepts learned in the Free Stroke (aka Gladstone/Stone). He clearly separates the two concepts and does NOT equate the Free Stroke (aka Gladstone/Stone) with the Moeller technique although he says Moeller builds on the Free Stroke. I really can't do much better than this explanation. Dom's terminology and basic explanations are good enough for me. They also coincide and confirm the info I've gleaned from Chapin, Tiger Bill, Morello, Gottlieb and others. If people choose to use a different terminology that's fine with me, but I think the explanations provided here are consistent with current concepts and definitions. If someone refers to the Gladstone technique they are most likely refering to the Free Stroke. If someone refrers to the Moeller technique, they are most likely refering to the whipping motion. That about sums it up.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Everything we do is music." - John Cage (1912-92)
|
|
|
|
kolp
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: August 24, 2004, 08:10 AM » |
|
OK. Hopefully this will be my last post on the subject. Although Gladstone, Stone and Moeller all had their own approaches to technique they undoubtedly shared many concepts. Nonetheless, in today's world we've come to equate the Free Stroke with Gladstone and/or Stone, and the whipping motion with Moeller.
I'll quote Dom Famularo's book 'It's Your Move', because he has studied with BOTH Morello (I.e. Gladstone/Stone/Free Stroke)and Chapin (Moeller).
On page 10 of his book, refering to the Free Stroke he states:Dom then goes on for about 5-6 pages describing the Free Stroke and exercises to develop it. If you want a complete description of the Free Stroke (aka Gladstone or Stone) read the lengthy description in Dom's book, refer to the Vic Firth website for Dom's video clips, and read Tiger Bill's explanation of the Free Stroke/Gladstone in his 3 part series 'Building Monster Chops'.
Now on page 16 of Dom's book explaining the Moeller stroke he states:Dom gives a very clear synopsis of the Free Stroke and attributes it's formal origins to Gladstone and Stone. He then gives a good overview of the Moeller Stroke, explaining it as the whipping motion and defining it as a separate technique from the Free Stroke, but one which builds on the concepts learned in the Free Stroke (aka Gladstone/Stone). He clearly separates the two concepts and does NOT equate the Free Stroke (aka Gladstone/Stone) with the Moeller technique although he says Moeller builds on the Free Stroke.
I really can't do much better than this explanation. Dom's terminology and basic explanations are good enough for me. They also coincide and confirm the info I've gleaned from Chapin, Tiger Bill, Morello, Gottlieb and others. If people choose to use a different terminology that's fine with me, but I think the explanations provided here are consistent with current concepts and definitions. If someone refers to the Gladstone technique they are most likely refering to the Free Stroke. If someone refrers to the Moeller technique, they are most likely refering to the whipping motion. That about sums it up.
So thats what I thought , no difference between Gladstone and Stone technique , I have the Dom book and it's The book to have for All drummer !!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bart Elliott
Chef de Cuisine
Platinum Member
Online
Posts: 12342
Groovin' on "Cissy Strut"!
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: August 24, 2004, 08:13 AM » |
|
Funkster ... thank you for the excellent and thorough response; I've learned something new today! Can't believe I don't have Dom's book, especially since I used to sell it for him on his website! 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Life is a beauty contest; whatever wins your heart ... wins your life.
|
|
|
|
gobarr
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: August 24, 2004, 08:16 AM » |
|
It seems there is a narrowing of definitions occuring here. In this current information age where more and more drummers have access to information concerning anything they desire is seems general definitions aren't good enough anymore.
Since I have also been quite confused with the differences, if any, between these terms or techniques I too am happier with a narrowing of the definitions. But, I would be just as satisfied if one or more of the terms were just not used any more if they were the same as ones that were already being used. It's no wonder English is so difficult to learn to foreigners as the language is riddled with so many synonyms, not to mention our crazy way of spelling certain words.
Since Funkster appears to have done his homework -- it has influenced me and so now I feel Free Stroke is sufficient to encompass or mean the same as Gladstone or Free bounce. And Moeller encompasses the total package and is distinctly set apart because of the whipping motion of the wrist and arms.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tony
supporter
Platinum Member
Offline
Posts: 2177
Art is the expression of the self.
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: August 24, 2004, 08:26 AM » |
|
Wow, it is so refreshing to see a thread like this. No ego getting in the way and the true sharing of information, without a lot of BS to get in the ay. Thanks Bart and Funkster (among others) for all the great information shared here.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The techniques, though they play an important role in the early stage, should not be too restrictive, complex or mechanical. If we cling to them, we will become bound by their limitation. Any technique, however worthy and desirable, becomes a disease when the mind is obsessed with it.
|
|
|
|
Plowboy
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: August 24, 2004, 08:29 AM » |
|
Jeez, I've been studying with Joe M. for the past six years. Mr. Gladstone taught the natural rebound and finger control. These techniques expanded upon what Mr. Stone had earlier taught Joe. Joe said Mr. Gladstone's teachings tied everything together for him.
There are such grandoise explanations on the Moeller technique which is basically a whipping motion. This is different from Mr. Gladstone's teachings, which was all about the natural rebound and utilizing the fingers.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: August 24, 2004, 08:39 AM » |
|
From what I have seen the 'Gladstone' technique uses the natural motion of the stick by just simply throwing it at the drum without tension in the wrist hands and fingers and letting the rebound bring the stick back up. 3 different heights for different for different volumes and that's more or less it.
Now as I have been taught Moeller the downstroke part involves stopping the stick immediately after striking the drum by squeezing the fingers and then using a wrist motion (up stroke) in preparation for the next stroke. Tiger Bill it seems is against this principle or stopping the stick against the will of the natural motion and then to waste energy in using a separate motion to bring the stick back up.
When I play the classic 4-4 grove (only a beginner)I'm told to use up, tap and down strokes on the height hat and to me this does seem like extra work compared to just throwing the stick to the drum letting it naturally rebound.
However Moeller sounds really cool for rudiments around the kit for different dynamic levels and so I think it is a case of different tools for different jobs as Mr. Famularo would say, cest la ve.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
funkster
Copper Member
Offline
Posts: 110
I love the Drummer Cafe!
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: August 24, 2004, 08:55 AM » |
|
Jeez, I've been studying with Joe M. for the past six years. Mr. Gladstone taught the natural rebound and finger control. These techniques expanded upon what Mr. Stone had earlier taught Joe. Joe said Mr. Gladstone's teachings tied everything together for him.
There are such grandoise explanations on the Moeller technique which is basically a whipping motion. This is different from Mr. Gladstone's teachings, which was all about the natural rebound and utilizing the fingers.
Plowboy, You are obviously closer to the source than me, but it sounds like your statements are consistent with what I've been trying to say. (I'm not trying to put words in your mouth.) BTW, hope I haven't made anything sound grandoise. That wasn't my intention. I've only been trying to explain to the best of my ability what I think of as Gladstone technique and Moeller. Thanks for the input.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Everything we do is music." - John Cage (1912-92)
|
|
|
felix
Cafe VIP
Platinum Member
Online
Posts: 8586
first class all the way :-)
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: August 24, 2004, 10:45 AM » |
|
I have a question on all this. The Art Verdi/Danny Gottleib (Dom is no slouch either) guys that really get lots and lots of speed- all semantics aside and lets say your are just going for really fast singles. Is this all done in the fingers and a free bounce (allthough timed differently as opposed to playing a double stroke) and can you (or should?) one use a slight lift or push of the wrist (palms down and or "thumb up" matched grip for argument's sake) for added momentum on the downstroke? Any thoughts? Or is the Gladstone / Morello technique a fingers only. And the question really is, what technique will let you play the fastest with the least amount of effort?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sonor, The Drummers Drum
|
|
|
|
kolp
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: August 24, 2004, 10:53 AM » |
|
Now as I have been taught Moeller the downstroke part involves stopping the stick immediately after striking the drum by squeezing the fingers and then using a wrist motion (up stroke) in preparation for the next stroke. Tiger Bill it seems is against this principle or stopping the stick against the will of the natural motion and then to waste energy in using a separate motion to bring the stick back up. Moeller stroke can be used without stopping the stick after the striking if there is another stroke who folow, just like the Gladstone technique : if you hit just one stroke with Gladstone technique after you have to tighten you finger to not let the stick fall . At least that's what I understand , pro here can comfirm 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
funkster
Copper Member
Offline
Posts: 110
I love the Drummer Cafe!
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: August 24, 2004, 10:56 AM » |
|
Now as I have been taught Moeller the downstroke part involves stopping the stick immediately after striking the drum by squeezing the fingers and then using a wrist motion (up stroke) in preparation for the next stroke. Tiger Bill it seems is against this principle or stopping the stick against the will of the natural motion and then to waste energy in using a separate motion to bring the stick back up.
I think your explanation of Moeller may lead to further confusion. You seem to indicate there is squeezing, stopping and tension in the Moeller stroke. This is not the case. Moeller utilizes relaxation, fluidity and constant motion. For further evidence check out Dom's book, Chapin's video, Morello's video, and Dom's and Chapin's clips on the Vic Firth website. At any rate, I doubt that Tiger Bill is opposed to the Moeller Stroke. I took a lesson from him and we discussed it in some detail. Moeller is just an additional tool in your arsenal. As I've pointed out in previous posts, Moeller can utilize the relaxation learned in the Free Stroke (Gladstone approach). The conepts are not mutually exclusive. To state that Tiger Bill is against Moeller simply because his article is about the Free Stroke (and not attempting to describe Moeller) is not accurate. This shouldn't so difficult!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Everything we do is music." - John Cage (1912-92)
|
|
|
|
gobarr
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #31 on: August 24, 2004, 02:29 PM » |
|
Felix, if speed is what your looking for you should take a stroll over to the WFD website: http://www.extremesportdrumming.com/The top two in the world Jotan Afanador with 1,199 single strokes in 1 minute and Mike Mangini with 1,180 have 2 different techniques. You can watch both Jotan and Mike playing from the videos on that website. If you notice Jotan's playing he is very relaxed and uses all fingers -- it almost looks effortless. However, when you watch Mike's playing you can see that he is straining with all his strength from shoulders down in order to force his muscles to vibrate at that speed and he does not use fingers. I had a long conversation personally with Tiger Bill about this very thing and he was the one that let me in on this information. It appears as though you can produce great speed using sheer muscle, but it obviously makes more sense to do it as relaxed as possible so that you don't wear yourself completely out as you can see Mike doing. Can you imagine doing that at a gig? -- you wouldn't last 2 songs. So the answer to your question Felix, using only the fingers and being relaxed is the smartest and best way to achieve the quickest speeds. Jotan proves this with his world record.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Carn
Gold Member
Offline
Posts: 627
|
 |
« Reply #32 on: August 24, 2004, 02:59 PM » |
|
well I always try to look at it like this: Moeller is really a motion thing, mainly using your underarm and wrist; while Gladstone is more fingercontrol related.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
boomka
Cafe VIP
Gold Member
Online
Posts: 658
|
 |
« Reply #33 on: August 24, 2004, 03:00 PM » |
|
I don't think anyone is being argumentative- it's just we have gone round and round about the semantics of these two (or one technique) techniques.
If you don't care, why waste bandwidth vainly responding to (and thus giving prominence to) this thread? Perhaps you ought to be off developing the "Felix technique" (I.e. doing nothing) so those of us interested in this conversation can read it without having to scroll through your periodic negative sniping. There is nothing wrong with new posters - or even people who have only recently (again) been exposed to/become interested in the Moeller and Gladstone technique(s) - hashing out a little detail if it results in more information being exchanged about these potentially helpful approaches. My experience with them has produced empirical evidence that they do work and can help some drummers develop speed, control and accuracy. If more people get the chance to think about/implement these techniques because of a thread like this, I think that's a positive thing for all of us. Thanks to Bart, Funkster, and all the others for wading through this issue in such depth. Working to create common language/understanding is tough slugging, but good work. The bits quoted from Famularo's book etc. are helpful as are all your explanations of your personal experiences with these techniques and the results.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
In lumine lucem
|
|
|
|
Plowboy
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #34 on: August 25, 2004, 06:17 AM » |
|
Funkster, I wasn't referring to your comments. I just remeber some other threads about the Moeller technique as well as John Riley's (a former student of Joe's) write-up in MD about the Moeller technique. Some drummers try to turn this technique into rocket science.
For maximum speed Joe suggests fingers only which is only a piece of the Gladstone technique, but obviously there is more than one way to get there. The bottom line is staying relaxed no matter what technique or application you use.
One other thing that Joe teaches and that is also part of the Gladstone technique is the open-closed technique, where you can get two strokes from every downstroke. The wrist (and arm) produces the first stroke and the fingers produce the second stroke. The key is getting both strokes to sound the same. This is a great technique for playing singles at speeds/tempos that are faster than what the wrists alone can produce.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kolp
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #35 on: August 25, 2004, 08:07 AM » |
|
Funkster, I wasn't referring to your comments. I just remeber some other One other thing that Joe teaches and that is also part of the Gladstone technique is the open-closed technique, where you can get two strokes from every downstroke. The wrist (and arm) produces the first stroke and the fingers produce the second stroke. The key is getting both strokes to sound the same. This is a great technique for playing singles at speeds/tempos that are faster than what the wrists alone can produce.
You talk about what Dave Weckl explain for play double stroke on his old video " Back to basic " or the open close technique of Gordy Knudtson ? ( same name btw ) ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Plowboy
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #36 on: August 26, 2004, 06:51 AM » |
|
The open-close technique is what I was referring to. Joe told me about Gordy's video and how he was showing in the video, one of Mr. Gladstone's techniques. The funny part according to Joe was that Gordy did not realize that this was a technique taught bt Mr. Gladstone.
Either way, the open-close technique or whatever you would like to call it does work.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
funkster
Copper Member
Offline
Posts: 110
I love the Drummer Cafe!
|
 |
« Reply #37 on: August 26, 2004, 07:06 AM » |
|
Plowboy, If you get a chance check out the new open/close thread. Bart spun off a new thread on just this subject. I had a couple of questions.
Later.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Everything we do is music." - John Cage (1912-92)
|
|
|
|
kolp
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #38 on: August 26, 2004, 07:09 AM » |
|
Joe told me about Gordy's video and how he was showing in the video, one of Mr. Gladstone's techniques.
Free stroke from Gladstone , open/close too , you said "one of Mr. Gladstone's techniques" is there another technique from Mr Glasdtone we can learn ? 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
scottclark
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #39 on: August 26, 2004, 09:49 AM » |
|
Moeller is better!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|