Check out the Christmas CD, "It's For You He Came", featuring Bart Elliott on drums and percussion, available in the Drummer Cafe Store.

NEW PREMIUM RESOURCE

Frank Briggs has provided yet another play-along for our Premium Resource subscribers. "Potato" is an intermediate level play-along track from Mike Keneally's CD, Sluggo!

Subscribers can download audio tracks (with and without drums as well as solo drums) plus a PDF drum transcription and recording session notes.



Drummer Cafe Community Forum
December 02, 2008, 01:20 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Christmas CD featuring Bart on drums & percussion.
 
   Home   Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Too loud for neighbors, need to make my ceiling quitererer.  (Read 511 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
toastysquirrel
Guest
« on: January 24, 2005, 08:20 PM »

Hey all,

Man, I don't know where else to look and my brain feels like it's about to burn up and leak out my ears.
I'm in the process of "sound proofing" a room and the last thing I'm screwing with now is the ceiling because, well, there's people above me.

I'm trying to weigh building a drop down ceiling versus installing Sheetblok.  And thus I'm trying to figure out what would work better:

a) Installing a layer of Sheetblok to the pre-existing ceiling.
b) Building a "drop down" ceiling comprised of 1-2 layers of soundboard and a single layer of paneling.

But I'll be damned if I can find anything that compares the DBs of the two.  I know Auralex's site says that Sheetblok is 6db better then lead... but I don't have any reference to go from.  Total cost in addition to man-hours spent (namely mine) is a bit of a factor; but I'm really interested in having some reference to go from.

I really appreciate it! Grin
Thanx!
Logged
toastysquirrel
Guest
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2005, 08:42 PM »

Here's a bit of clarification for anyone peeping at my latest quandary.


Actually the room's used as a bedroom/entertainment
area.  The dwelling in question is a house, although
I'm renting the space.  Not worried about the sound
leaking out through the sides but I've got two
bedrooms situated directly over the room I'm looking
to proof.

The best help I've gotten on this area came from a
couple local music shops.  While they've supplied me
with ample amounts of information they suggested if
I've got any lingering questions to hit up some local
music boards.

And thus how I happened upon DC.
Logged
cavanman
Cafe VIP
Gold Member

Online Online

Posts: 984


"And I do the Cha-Cha like a little sissy Girl"


« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2005, 08:43 PM »

toasty,

I believe beloved veteran DC member, felix, has a day job selling sound proofing and may be able to interject. I'm not sure of what product it is but it could possibly be somewhat high end if I am discerning some of his posts correctly - but don't quote me on that.

I do know you should plan on doing some floor acoustic treatment as that can be problematic if you are sharing walls. I think a successful attempt will also depend on what kind of structure you live in (townhome, condo, apartment, duplex. etc.). I think most apartments may just be a futile effort. Sad

Do some homework by picking up a copy of Mix magazine and call some companies advertising products for studios to deal with sound problems and see what they say.

My .02 - and sympathy FWIW

Jim
Logged

"I like-uh....dooo....da cha-cha..."
Chip71
Cafe VIP
Platinum Member

Online Online

Posts: 2607



« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2005, 08:54 PM »

Regulating your hours with the neighbor and lighter sticks may be the best answer.... 6 decimals isn't much against a neighbor with big ears.  There are some people you will never please no matter how much you spend. I watch for my neighbor to leave and then practice for a bit. Saves a lot of problems for both parties. No matter how much you spend it will never please a neighbor who has a hot line to the cops.  Wink
Logged

"When you quit learning you start dieing"-My Grandfather
Vintage Ludwig
Platinum Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1522



« Reply #4 on: January 24, 2005, 09:07 PM »

Regulating your hours with the neighbor and lighter sticks may be the best answer.... 6 decimals isn't much against a neighbor with big ears.  There are some people you will never please no matter how much you spend. I watch for my neighbor to leave and then practice for a bit. Saves a lot of problems for both parties. No matter how much you spend it will never please a neighbor who has a hot line to the cops.  Wink
Yup-good advice during the interim.  Try talking to your neighbor to find a happy medium.  Before I converted a detatched garage (18x24), I had to go thru this sort of thing.  But looking back, if I would have been able to work something out PRIOR to t-ing the offending neighbor, I possibly could have saved a TON of money-and averted getting to know my towns finest very well.  So maybe you should just talk to this neighbor before you completely p-them off-
Logged
buzz57
Silver Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 301


I love the Drummer Cafe!


« Reply #5 on: January 25, 2005, 02:54 PM »

The way I see it, as long as one pursues his or her music responsibly, and at sane hours, he shouldnt have to worry too much about neighbors unless the local bylaws prohibit *all* loud sounds. I play days when I can, some evenings but not after 8:00, and weekends. I dont see that as excessive myself. If it is, then perhaps mowing the lawn, sawing up wood, using power tools, etc. are also a punishable offenses. Just my $0.02 worth.
Im basing my comments on detached dwelling here...if this is an apartment or shared building, thats a different matter, as the sound is that much closer. Just for clarification.
Logged

Drum! Its the most exercise you'll ever get while sitting on your ass.
SheldonWhite
Guest
« Reply #6 on: January 25, 2005, 03:17 PM »

You just need one of these:
http://toddsucherman.com/drumroom_main.htm
 Grin
Logged
groovin
Guest
« Reply #7 on: January 25, 2005, 04:10 PM »

I think thats more drums than ive seen at my local Guitar center,thats insane!some awsome stuff....Somebodys making some serious$$$$$$$
Logged
rdmitch
supporter
Silver Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 393


The cafe is ...mmmmkay


WWW
« Reply #8 on: January 25, 2005, 04:51 PM »

Thats just not fair. No one should own this many sets and snares
He even has TWO DW Timeless Timber sets!!
Logged

I wish I was 1/2 the man my dog thinks I am.
marker
Gold Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 666


I love the Drummer Cafe!


« Reply #9 on: January 25, 2005, 05:45 PM »

To keep things from bothering the neighbors.

If what you play is mostly high frequencies,  anything soft on the walls will work to keep things in control.

However, for bass tones, you will need real thick, dense, hard stuff to keep it from reaching your neighbors up above.

So, the more thick, solid stuff, the better, if you want to keep the bass from spreading.  Maybe double thick drywall?   Your drop down ceiling may work well, but put the soundboard below, and  the drywall on top.

Once again, for the highs, anything soft, like old sheets or blankets, will keep that under control.  It will make life easier for you, too, so give that a try no matter what the neighbors think.
Logged
AllanSpeers
Guest
« Reply #10 on: January 25, 2005, 11:16 PM »

QUOTE:

"I know Auralex's site says that Sheetblok is 6db better then lead.."

-Not in the low frequencies, it aint.  Notice that they give no specs below 100 HZ.. There's a reason.


Toasty,

If you have a problem that is serious enough that you MUST solve it, then based on your original post I suggest that you aren't ready to make any decisions yet.  You may get some good advice from this and other threads, (a few good points, above) but you will not be able to put it all together in a way that will maximize your dollar and time expenditure. There are many, MANY little mistakes that you might make which would render the whole project almost useless.

I suggest you do some reading first,  and by that I mean the library kind, not websites.  The amount of mis-information that exists online, both in private sites and companies selling product, is astounding.
Try the several books by F. Alton Everest as a start, though there are many other excellent choices.  

Once you're ready, the bottom line answer will be a "dropped ceiling."  -but only if it's built on seperate walls.  If you do it right, you probably WON'T need a complete "room within a room"  i.e. you probably don't have to float the floor.  

If your floor is wooden, not concrete, then you can also make some improvement by building an isolated drum-riser.  -Isolating the source is a whole lot easier than soundproofing the whole room.

Also, bear in mind that if you do the room properly, you will need a new source of heating AND ventilation.  (Breathing is generally a good thing.)

Last thing:  It's  not enough to soundproof the room, you must also give it some life.  If you make the inner surface completely dead, or leave it with pronounced standing-waves, you will not enjoy practicing.

(BTW, I used to build rooms for a living.)

Good luck on your journey
Logged
felix
Cafe VIP
Platinum Member

Online Online

Posts: 8751


Y no keno!


« Reply #11 on: January 26, 2005, 02:19 AM »

check out my webpage

www.woolyinc.com

It has quite a bit of comprehensive frequency data in the 100 Hz bands and below for different wall constructions... even with loaded vinyl (sheetblok)- so you can compare the two and get a feel for the performance of the products

Sheetblok is nice for floors but terrible for walls and ceilings.  Very hard to work with.  You would like our product, it's like working with drywall but with limp mass attenuation curves.  You will like it.

Ok, have fun soundproofing your room.
Logged

Yaay!
rdmitch
supporter
Silver Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 393


The cafe is ...mmmmkay


WWW
« Reply #12 on: January 26, 2005, 04:01 AM »

Just another thought...
If you are going through this exercise to appease your neighbors so you can practice, it may be most cost effective for you to buy a used set of electronic drums and play through headphones.  I can play all night on my little Roland set and not wake up a mouse.

If your having band practice at your house...back to the soundproofing.
Logged

I wish I was 1/2 the man my dog thinks I am.
Budrock
Copper Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 61


I love the Drummer Cafe!


WWW
« Reply #13 on: January 26, 2005, 09:31 AM »

The word is;  quieter

Or you could say, more quiet.

Sorry, I'm in one of those moods today.
Logged
felix
Cafe VIP
Platinum Member

Online Online

Posts: 8751


Y no keno!


« Reply #14 on: January 26, 2005, 03:07 PM »

There are a few of us left who despise playing electronic drums.  I bought an electric kit when I was exiled to a duplex for a while.  I got to the point where I practiced piano instead of drums entirely.  Just me though.
Logged

Yaay!
AllanSpeers
Guest
« Reply #15 on: January 26, 2005, 07:05 PM »

Felix,

I'm all for new technologies, and so am quite interested in your Woolywall product.  However, there is much data that I would need in order to make a decision, and I don't see this data on your website.  If you can post it hear, that would be most helpful
------------------------------

1:  Your chart doesn't go below 80 hz, and the pdf's don't show anything below 100 hz.  The typical fundamental frequency of a 24" kick is 40 HZ.

How much does Woolywall drop off at 40 HZ, vs its 80 hz spec?  

** 2:  For a given THICKNESS of product,  what are the comparative STL numbers, at 40 HZ, for Woolywall, loaded vinyl, sheetblok, and sheet lead?      At 100 HZ

3:  If one were to construct barriers out of Woolywall, loaded vinyl, sheetblok, and sheet lead,  using various thicknesses such that they all give 20 db STL at 40 HZ, (and assuming they were all mounted the same way)  how would they compare cost-wise?    

How would they compare weight-wise?  (I can see that 0.2" Woolywall is significantly lighter than 1/2" gypsum board, and MUCH lighter than 0.1" loaded-vinyl, but real numbers would help.)
==============================

I am pretty sure that nothing will beat sheet lead at 40 hz (assuming one wants to deal with the environmental hazards.)  Density is density, rarefaction is rarefaction.   1/2" lead will do 14 db at 100hz all by itself, without the rest of the wall, and it's not all that expensive.

However, one thing that looks interesting about Woolywall is it's ABSORBTION characteristics.  I'm not sure what actual sabines your chart numbers reflect, but the absorption from 1K down looks amazingly even.  I'd love to know the LF absorbtion coefficients of Woolywall vs the other products.

Having higher LF coefficients could mean that WW has a small edge in taming standing waves. Even though the effect would be slight, it could still be significant in certain applications, especially if it ends up being the inner-most surface.  (a bad idea, but I'm sure people do it all the time)

=============================

Last:    Not to be argumentative  (who, me?)  but something in those pdf's has me puzzled.  From what I can see, the three walls tested were identical, except for the Woolywall & loaded-vinyl products replacing on 1/2" layer of gypsum board in the total contruction.  So  , when comparing the three sets of numbers, one is in fact getting a pretty good idea of how Woolywall, limp vinyl, and 1/2" gypsum compare.  (well, sort of)

Given that, it is surprising to see that the 1/2 gypsum is actually 2 db superior at 100 hz, with Woolywall and vinyl tied at 18 db.    At 5Khz,  the vinyl is 10 db superior to both Woolywall and the gypsum.  -And that's only 0.1" vinyl.   Your woolywall tested was 0.2", and it still tied with the 0.1" vinyl product and lost to the 1/2" gypsum.

-Don't blame me, these are the specs listed in the pdf's you have on your website.  Am I mis-reading something?  

So, other than the significant weight savings, what are the theoretical advantages of Woolywall vs the other typical barrier products?

Cost?
Ease of installation?
Logged
felix
Cafe VIP
Platinum Member

Online Online

Posts: 8751


Y no keno!


« Reply #16 on: January 27, 2005, 08:13 AM »

I'll try to answer your questions the best I can.  

I'm going to post some links to some testing data on  some 1lb./sq ft. prototype barrier I did a few years ago.  This data extends down to 25Hz.
Notice how the #'s don't make alot of sense from 25-63Hz:

www.woolyinc.com/1lbdata1.jpg

Then check out the graph if you want:

www.woolyinc.com/1lbgraph.jpg

Notice how the readings spike in the low frequencies by 3 and 4 db.  You record alot so you really know how "loud" a db. is.  It's a relatively large increment.

Anyways- I'm way more of a plastic person as opposed to a sound engineer, but the engineers I deal with in the testing facilities tell me that readings in these frequencies are hard to accurately measure because the waves are so large at those frequencies.  I guess a 20 Hz wave is something like 80 ft. from crest to crest.  Typically we are asked to build a 9'x15' wall sample.

So anyways most of my customers, well all of them except for you LOL, don't ask about these very low frequencies.  And the ASTM tests have more variations than I care to keep up with.  A customer basically tells me what ASTM or Absorbtion test they want to carry out (usually an E-90 in some form or another) and I get the sample tested, pass along the data, make a few recommendations on densities and price etc.  All in a days work.

*I can see everyone's eyes glazing over*

Maybe we all can learn something from this little exercise- I'm not trying to hawk our product either- I make my money from automotive and trucking companies- the studio stuff is basically a loser; I keep doing it for basically "fun" and "moral/ethical" reasons.  So I hope the moderators don't mind if I continue.  I could honestly care less if you guys buy it- drummers are definitely not my target market.

So anyhow I'm going to answer Allan's last question "how they compare weight wise".  This next test was done with 1.56 lb per square foot material- the wwall I have now is heavier but not tested; check it out:

www.woolyinc.com/wwallstc.jpg

Lets look at the performance now at 80Hz since we seem to have the most accurate data between the two samples test data.

1lb./ square ft prototype *comparable if not better than loaded vinyl at the same density* gets a transmission loss of 13 db.

1.56lb./ square ft wwall ticks in at 17- That's 4 db. better- not a bad improvement.

I don't have data on lead sheet in wall systems.  It comes in a lot of different thickness' but yes, the stuff is very heavy.  No argument here.  It also is probably tricky to work with.  I don't think it has the dynamic dampening properties of a flexible system either.  But I hire out my engineering work, so I can't answer you any better for free at this time.

And finally the real #'s that are important in our wall system comparison is the performance vs. density factor. You really have to read into it and that's my mistake- I need to go into my webpage and explain what's going on a bit better.  But the 9.61 lbs./sq. ft. vs. the 7.9 lbs./sq. ft. is kicker.  Remember there is a layer of RSC channel in the vinyl's wall construction also.  

One could add RSC channel to a woolywall system and get better low end performance.  I have data on that also, but actually didn't post it because I should have mixed the layers differently for optimum attenuation.

What I have found out about this business is there are a bazillion wall constructions people want to use for different budgets and performance requirements.  I can't test for everyone- it's veryexpensive and time consuming.  You really just have to build a few walls and ceilings with the different materials.  Thanks for understanding.

Also I have found that the snare drum is probably just as bad if not more of a sonic offender than the kick.  Drywall by itself seems to really be more "conductive" to those frequencies than kick drum.  My engineer calls that the wall's "resonate frequency".  If you tap on a snare then tap on a piece of wallboard, it's kind of uncanny how similar the fundamentals are.
Hope this helped.   Smiley


Logged

Yaay!
AllanSpeers
Guest
« Reply #17 on: January 27, 2005, 10:55 AM »

Hey, Felix.

Quite interesting.  I missed the bit about the resilient channel in the vinyl wall.  I'll have to look again later, but sure, that would make a significant difference.  Since that is adversely affecting the comparison, and not in your favor, it definitely DOES need to be clarified on your website.

I would indeed like to continue this discussion here, as I can see where your product would be a good choice in certain applications  (I HATE working with lead)  -but I will ask Bart to jump in first and say that it's OK to get that far off.  I don't think anyone will accuse you of hawking your product, since I am asking direct questions about it.

Bart?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC | Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.262 seconds with 21 queries.

You support this site when you purchase from Musician's Friend through the Drummer Cafe!
Copyright ©2001 - 2008 Drummer Cafe. All rights reserved.
developed by Bart Elliott | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Site Map