Amazon.com Widgets
Musician's Friend
Power Search!

Top Drumming CDs

  Features some fantastic drumming by Willie Bobo, Francisco Aguabella, Carlos Vidal, Armando Perazza. For more "must have" albums ... CLICK HERE!
 
Drummer Cafe News Feed
Visit us on MySpace
July 06, 2008, 10:40 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Stuff DVD Live At Montreux 1976 features Steve Gadd on drums.
   Forum   Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: micking congas  (Read 3300 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
chilledbongo
Bronze Member

Online Online

Posts: 179


« on: August 01, 2006, 11:05 PM »

ok, who's got advice on micing congas?
which equipment and mics are preferred? placement? LP claw grips? or overhead boom mics? from the top or the bottom?
which mics are best?
Logged

less is more
Bart Elliott
Chef de Cuisine
Platinum Member

Online Online

Posts: 12342


Groovin' on "Cissy Strut"!


WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 02, 2006, 08:47 AM »

Any mic that works well on the Snare drum or Toms will work on the Congas ... starting with SM57 all the way up to nice condenser mics like the AKG 414. A mic with a cardiod pattern is best, allowing you to individually mic each drum. You can use one mic between drums if you don't have the ability to mic each drum individually. Place the mics close enough to isolate the drum, but no so close that it will be in the way of your playing. Congas are unique in that we don't just play in the center of the drum, which is more common with drummers playing a Snare or Tom Tom.

Mic the Congas from the top, unless you are wanting some sort of special effect by placing a mic underneath. You're not going to get all the nuance strokes and articulate slaps if you mic any other way that from the top. The angle to start with could be the 45 degree angle approach, just like on Toms or Snares.

When placing more than one mic on a Conga set-up, be sure to follow the 3:1 ratio ... that is whatever the distance is from the mic to the conga, all other mics should be at least three times further away. Altering the angle and direction of the mic will help you if you can't follow the 3:1 rule.

LP Mic Claws ... I own them and have used them for years. The are very convenient, however, mics such as the SM57 seem to eventually slide off the clip during performances because of the vibration. I've had this happen to me in live recordings which is NOT good! I believe there is more vibration and impact from the Conga than a Tom or Snare drum ... simply because you are using your entire hand. The solution, if you want to use the Mic Claw, is to use a mic with a really good clip. The design of the SM57 and its clip is simply not made to be pointed upside down and remain intact. Duct tape could be used, but that would be messy.

Logged

Life is a beauty contest; whatever wins your heart ... wins your life.
windhorse
supporter
Gold Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 679



WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2006, 09:36 AM »

Glad Bart jumped in early and grounded the thread with his excellent advice!

For clip-ons, I recommend the Sennheiser E604. They came in a three pack, so if you play three at a time,, there's a deal to be had.

Bart, curious if there's a Scientific explanation of the 3-1 rule for secondary mics..
No worries, I fully believe you anyway.

Dave
Logged

Hollow a log into a drum.
It's the space inside that makes the sound.

Bart Elliott
Chef de Cuisine
Platinum Member

Online Online

Posts: 12342


Groovin' on "Cissy Strut"!


WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 02, 2006, 10:23 AM »

Bart, curious if there's a Scientific explanation of the 3-1 rule for secondary mics..

The 3:1 ratio (aka "three to one rule") is just a way to prevent interference between what two microphones are picking up. If two microphones are used and they are intended to pick up two sound sources, they must be placed at least three times the distance that either microphone is from it’s intended sound source.

Rather than reinventing the wheel, I did a little searching and found a nice explanation of the 3:1 rule, complete with diagrams.
 
Logged

Life is a beauty contest; whatever wins your heart ... wins your life.
congaron
Copper Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 58


Midwest church percussionist and gigging guy


« Reply #4 on: August 02, 2006, 11:58 AM »

That's awesome!  Explains a few things...Thanks Bart.

God bless!

-Ron
Logged

Playing many homemade instruments, and a Schalloch/Sonor conga/bongo set-up.  Maximum music....minimum investment.  Ask me about the Homemade chimes with the reversible front row, and the chime rack welded from an old bed frame.
chilledbongo
Bronze Member

Online Online

Posts: 179


« Reply #5 on: August 03, 2006, 01:27 PM »

thanks....all good tips....who's got some more recommendations for conga mics? which models work well? dont want to break the bank, but need to be heard above the plugged-in guitars and basses!
Logged

less is more
563
supporter
Platinum Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 6605


drum + hand


WWW
« Reply #6 on: August 04, 2006, 02:27 PM »

My vote: Audix D series with the D-Vice.   Compact, great sound, reasonable price. 
Logged

Making bad art.  Saying stupid things.  Implimenting my master plan to be forgotten when I'm gone and forgettable while I'm here.

The Luna Moth
me
Tableland
windhorse
supporter
Gold Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 679



WWW
« Reply #7 on: August 04, 2006, 03:39 PM »

Yeah, I'll second the Audix D's. Affordable, and perfect, if you're micing from Booms. Still prefer the Sennheisers if you're clipping-on to prevent blead through because the rest of the band makes too much noise.
I played a nice acoustic gig with just two D2s and it was the best most authentic sound I've ever heard from my congas.

Dave
Logged

Hollow a log into a drum.
It's the space inside that makes the sound.

congaron
Copper Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 58


Midwest church percussionist and gigging guy


« Reply #8 on: August 08, 2006, 08:32 AM »

I am currently experimenting with an earset electret mike I built from a radio shack unidirectional element.  In my music room, I have recorded conga and vocals with this mike in a different configurarion using an LP claw.  As an earhook, it records a fantastic conga sound with the advantage of being a vocal mike too.  The unidirectional design is feedback resistant, and I'm continuing to test the uses.  I can hear a dramatic rejection of sound to the sides as I turn my head or body away from my monitors while recording them to test for feedback....so I'm expecting great things on stage.  I'll be using it in our practice studio, and live at the next gig.  So far, this is actually as good as the various mikes I've used for crisp conga quality sound, dynamic or condensor.  I'll keep you posted...I'm a little flabbergasted at this, frankly.  The total cost of making this mike is under $10, although it does require an external battery...you could make a phantom power setup in a small box if you wanted to, as the schematics are readily available online. 


God bless!

-Ron
Logged

Playing many homemade instruments, and a Schalloch/Sonor conga/bongo set-up.  Maximum music....minimum investment.  Ask me about the Homemade chimes with the reversible front row, and the chime rack welded from an old bed frame.
Bongobob
supporter
Copper Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 124



« Reply #9 on: August 10, 2006, 08:05 AM »

I had this discussion before http://www.drummercafe.com/component/option,com_smf/Itemid,2/topic,13152.0

I finally went with the Audix D2 on congas and a D1 on bongo's. I use the LP Claw to hold them. I clamp them to the tuning lug which I think hold better then the rim. They sound great and stay put with all the vibration. I bought all of them on EBay, but watch the price's, sometimes you can get a better deal on sale somewhere else.
Logged
gilbert
Guest
« Reply #10 on: August 11, 2006, 03:16 AM »

I'm using Shure Beta 98 D/S on my congas , they come with a multi purpose clamp and they fit on all different instruments
I bought them after a long series of comparisons and tests
I beleive they are the best mics available for conga and other percussion instruments because their range of frequency is very wide
Logged
Bart Elliott
Chef de Cuisine
Platinum Member

Online Online

Posts: 12342


Groovin' on "Cissy Strut"!


WWW
« Reply #11 on: August 11, 2006, 07:49 AM »

I'm using Shure Beta 98 D/S on my congas , they come with a multi purpose clamp and they fit on all different instruments
I bought them after a long series of comparisons and tests
I beleive they are the best mics available for conga and other percussion instruments because their range of frequency is very wide

Certainly may be a nice mic for you ... but by no means the "best" ... which is a relative term. Not to be picky with this, but I really dislike placing a label like "best" on something without more qualifications and criterias. Perhaps for the money or price range, in conjuction with the sound quality (broad frequency range), you feel this is the "best" mic for congas. I can think of numerous mics that are far better ... like AKG 414 ... which is a large diaphragm condensor mic ... but it also costs 5 times more than your Shure Beta 98 ... and the occupy a lot more space.
Logged

Life is a beauty contest; whatever wins your heart ... wins your life.
bongo
supporter
Gold Member

Online Online

Posts: 801


Designated Driver


« Reply #12 on: August 11, 2006, 04:40 PM »

Certainly may be a nice mic for you ... but by no means the "best" ... which is a relative term. Not to be picky with this, but I really dislike placing a label like "best" on something without more qualifications and criterias. Perhaps for the money or price range, in conjuction with the sound quality (broad frequency range), you feel this is the "best" mic for congas. I can think of numerous mics that are far better ... like AKG 414 ... which is a large diaphragm condensor mic ... but it also costs 5 times more than your Shure Beta 98 ... and the occupy a lot more space.

Bart, you say you don't like him using the expression "best", then turn around and use "far better" to describe AKG 414, but offer no criteria except that it costs 5 times more. How is it better?

Personally I've been using the Beta 98s too and think they sound good, both live and for recording. They do have a flat wide frequency range, are small and discrete. Only gripe is the rim mount does not clip easily on my conga's traditional cuban style crown, I've got to be careful it mounts firmly. The lower claw grip can slip on the skin wrapped ring.
Logged
Bart Elliott
Chef de Cuisine
Platinum Member

Online Online

Posts: 12342


Groovin' on "Cissy Strut"!


WWW
« Reply #13 on: August 11, 2006, 06:54 PM »

Bart, you say you don't like him using the expression "best", then turn around and use "far better" to describe AKG 414, but offer no criteria except that it costs 5 times more. How is it better?

I did give criteria ... sorry if you don't understand what that is.

Large Diaphragm ... going to be better than a small diaphragm at picking up low-end.
Frequency Spectrum is better on a AKG 414 than on the Beta 98. Pretty foolish to argue about that really.

To me, saying that something is better and giving some reasons why is very different that saying that something is "best". Just read the mic specs and most of this is pretty obvious.

bongo ... the ONLY thing I was trying to address was the whole "best" label. And I'm not suggesting that the AKG 414 is the "best" either. My point is that the term is relative and subjective. I think you knew what I meant when I was trying to bring correction and clarity. No need to try and make this any more than what it is.  Cool

I only picked the AKG 414 as one example, because I own a pair of them. I would never take them out for a live gig; it would be complete overkill ... not to mention a huge risk.
Logged

Life is a beauty contest; whatever wins your heart ... wins your life.
gilbert
Guest
« Reply #14 on: August 12, 2006, 04:12 AM »

the specs are way better for AKG you're right and I dont mean by that Frequency spectrum nor Large Diaphragm
because the last thing you want while playing is that your mics pick the sounds from other instruments and thats what Large diaphragm do in most microphones
but in AKG you have 5 polar patterns you can choose between them and for me the best is hypercardoid then you wont pick up anything
as for the frequency spectrum is like the shure not very different
but let say you want to use only 2 congas then you will put 1 AKG mic for that and you wont be able to put it in a hypercardoid mode because you need to pickup the 2 congas so we'll put it in a mode to capture both congas and here's the problem in capturing other instruments
as for shure you will need 2 mics which are in price of 1 AKG mic and you wont have problems in changing mode plus they are supercardoid so they only pick your instrument

finally I prefer the shure mic for live performances while I changed my mind on them concerning recording I liked the AKG specs for recording
Logged
Bart Elliott
Chef de Cuisine
Platinum Member

Online Online

Posts: 12342


Groovin' on "Cissy Strut"!


WWW
« Reply #15 on: August 12, 2006, 08:49 AM »

You all are missing my point, which is that there is no one "best" mic for congas, but that's fine ... I'll let it go.
Logged

Life is a beauty contest; whatever wins your heart ... wins your life.
bongo
supporter
Gold Member

Online Online

Posts: 801


Designated Driver


« Reply #16 on: August 12, 2006, 01:21 PM »

Bart
Sorry for muddling the issue, I can see your point; there may be no 'best' but you CAN rate stuff as 'better'.

As far as microphones go I do not have a lot of side by side comparative experience, so honestly could learn more.

Take a hypothetical: a large diameter and expensive dynamic mic, versus a high quality expensive small condenser. Lets say they both have similar flat decibel curves that range from 30 to 20K Hz. Then what characteristic makes one sound better? Or does it?

I know these small condenser mics are getting pretty good and out perform some of the old standards in dynamic mics as far as frequency range. But I can't hear over 15,000 Hz anyway, so does this upper end really matter? The lower end in the cheaper mics is 50-70 Hz and I think it makes a difference for the subs to go 30 Hz. Are any of these expensive dynamic mics going 10 or 20 Hz? The human can't hear that but I do believe we feel it in our body.

Anyway I should research this, pull out spec sheets, etc and learn something other than just speculate. I have no doubt there is something in the sound that warrents spending the extra bucks on a high quality studio mic, I just don't what it is. If the the frequency range is comparitive, then is it some quality trait like clarity?
Logged
Bart Elliott
Chef de Cuisine
Platinum Member

Online Online

Posts: 12342


Groovin' on "Cissy Strut"!


WWW
« Reply #17 on: August 12, 2006, 02:03 PM »

Anyway I should research this, pull out spec sheets, etc and learn something other than just speculate. I have no doubt there is something in the sound that warrents spending the extra bucks on a high quality studio mic, I just don't what it is. If the the frequency range is comparitive, then is it some quality trait like clarity?

Well ... I do think that when it comes to live music, often times the expensive mics are wasted because you just can't hear the quality differences in that type of environment. That's subjective too because it depends on the sound system and the venue. When I purchase mics, I always try to go for studio quality as much as possible ... but I also don't want to take my nice, expensive mics out in the sun or smoke-filled bars. You have to compromise, in my opinion, between cost, durability and quality.

Back to the original mention of the Beta 98 ... for the money, and for live work, I'm sure that these mics do a fantastic job for a vast majority of individuals. I've actually used these mics myself, but I don't own them. I've done the small diaphragm thing and already have other mics I can use that work for me. Most of the live work I do is being recorded ... as in live albums ... so the mic choices are a bit different. I'm sure that the Beta 98 would work well in a live recording environment too ... but I just wouldn't choose them for that. The whole 'large diaphragm mics accepting too much bleed from other instruments' isn't really a problem that I've run into. Perhaps if I was on a very small stage in a small club that would be a potential problem ... but everything I'm doing is where the musicians are spread out rather nicely.
Logged

Life is a beauty contest; whatever wins your heart ... wins your life.
bongo
supporter
Gold Member

Online Online

Posts: 801


Designated Driver


« Reply #18 on: August 14, 2006, 11:21 PM »


the Beta 98s ..... Only gripe is the rim mount does not clip easily on my conga's traditional cuban style crown, I've got to be careful it mounts firmly. The lower claw grip can slip on the skin wrapped ring.


I just pulled the Beta 98 spec sheet and learned you can flip the lower claw for a wider grip designed for cymbal stands. It works good now on my congas.

The frequency range of the mic is rated 20 to 20K Hz, but it's not that flat of curve.
Close miced the bass response is good down to 20 Hz, but the high end kind of peters out above 18K.
Logged
atom
Copper Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 3


« Reply #19 on: August 28, 2006, 09:48 PM »

I get great sound with a single SM57 placed between the congas.  Quick, easy, inexpensive, and great sound. 
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC | Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.129 seconds with 22 queries.
Google


We currently have 6 guests and 11 members online.
Copyright ©2001 - 2008 Drummer Cafe. All rights reserved.
developed by Bart Elliott | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Site Map