hi can anybody help me please.. i am considering buying a 1966 ludwig acrolite snare. I also would like to know if a 1975 acrolite is much different, sound wise because they are both on ebay and i can't try them! i really need some advice. Thanks, Mick.

Another difference between the 60's and 70's versions are that the 60's version is a bright chrome finish whereas the 70's version is a brushed chrome finish.  I have one of each and I like my older one much better.  To me it has more a crisper sound than does my 70's version.  Just my 2 cents.

Oh, and the badges are different.  They keystone is much cooler....

My unscientific opinion is that the keystone (60's) Acros are your better bet if you're buying them without getting to play them first. EVERY 60's Acro I've heard sounded GREAT. Some 70s (blue/aqua badge) Acros I've played were a little mushy. Ludwig's quality control in the 70's was not its best, since they were suddenly SO popular, and cranking out drums like crazy. If you find a blue/aqua badge Acro and it sounds great, buy it. But if you're buying over the Web, I'd recommend the keystone. It will probably cost a little more, but you're pretty much assured of getting a great sounding snare.

The new black sparkle Acros sound great, too. I've got a 6.5x14 "Blacro" that absolutely kills.

I have to agree with what everyone has said. The 60's is the better choice.