Hey bart I was semi-kidding, I've just seen people who read all they do and can't do anything that's not down on paper!
Oh I know you were just kidding around. I wasn't directing anything to you ... but merely wanted to address the countless excuses and negative views of reading music. I know people just like you do ... who can't play unless it's written out or on paper. In that case, they aren't going to need to be creative anyway because they are just reading what's on the page. They might have some creative interpretations with what's written ... which is very cool ... but it's not like they are improvising. If it's written, then you are supposed to read what's there ... unless the genre requires that add to or subtract from what's written. Sometimes the written music is just a guide to give you an idea ... such as a transcribed jazz solo within a big band.
If people can't play outside of the written music ... then it's not READING the music that is the problem ... it's them!
All of this is like saying "guns kill people" therefore "guns are bad". That is just silly. So applying to music, reading music is not bad ... it's when people use it as a crutch and never truly master their instrument by being able to freely express themselves on it ... that's what's bad.
Truly great musicians can read music, write music, speak music ... and fully express the music that is in them. I don't care if you name the most famous drummer in the world ... if he/she can't read/write music ... they are only operating at 80% of their full potential.
If you can only speak Spanish, but can't read or write it ... do you really KNOW the Spanish language? Sure, you can exist in a culture that uses this language, but you are limited on what you can do. You'd basically be a blind, illiterate, Spanish speaking individual.
Now ... put that in your pipe and smoke it!