Amazon.com Widgets

Top Drumming CDs

The above album features some incredible drumming by Tony Williams. For more "must have" albums ... CLICK HERE!
 
Musician's Friend
Power Search!
Visit us on MySpace
August 21, 2008, 08:28 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
IN THE NEWS: Shop Musician's Friend through the Drummer Cafe and get a $10 Instant Rebate using MF4U coupon code.
   Forum   Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Leaders leading  (Read 911 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Thrak
Guest
« on: January 15, 2003, 06:29 AM »

After reading the recent posts on "Advice" in the main lobby I offer a flipside.

What if the "leader" does not share the excitement and vision of the other members?  What if the leader's the primary songwriter but is not good at leading?   This includes small details and logistics - such as coming to rehearsal ready to play, sharing new ideas, songs;  commenting on takes; having enough back-up strings, etc...  It may also include booking, promoting, networking, etc...  On these last points, myself and the bass player cover these grounds, and we don't mind.  It's just hard when not everyone shares a vision.

How do you spark a fire?  How do you get someone interested in "jamming" during rehearsals?  

We in the core of the group enjoy findin that space near the end of a song that we know well, to jam out on it.  You know experiment... find some new twists.  The problem is, said leader will usually try for a minute, then set his guitar down and walk out of the room.  When questioned later, he says something like "I don't really enjoy jamming, and would only like to work on songs when we're here."  This is where we say, "jamming is a great way to get comfortable with each other and find new elements to incorporate".

I think my point is getting convoluted and lost, but perhaps some of you can appreciate the situation and offer some golden gems of advice on how to approach a big "sit-down talk" with this guy.  

Thanks,
Thrak


 
Logged
Bart Elliott
Chef de Cuisine
Platinum Member

Online Online

Posts: 12492


How have you bean burrito?


WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2003, 08:42 AM »

Well ... if it's the leader's band, there's not a lot you can do. It may mean that you need to move to other things.
But before we do something drastic, let's look at a few things.

The whole booking, promoting, networking and organization issue could/should be handled by a manager or management company.

I think that it's very easy to address the "not being prepared for rehearsal". Simply state that you are concerned about wasting rehearsal time ... which happens when someone is not prepared. Everyone should be practicing their own parts at home, then putting it all together at the rehearsal. There's a big difference between practice and rehearsal; you practice at home, you rehearse together.

Becareful about the whole "wasting time" as it's very evident that your leader finds your "jamming" to be a waste of time.

Jamming can be a waste of time if it's allowed to happen every time you rehearse a song. Often time players who lack the discipline needed to work on a tune over and over until it's right ... just want to jam. It's easier to jam because you just play what you want.

Perhaps your leader doesn't feel that there needs to be creative time during this rehearsal time.

So with all of this, I would examine yourself first. Are you a good follower? Do you take direction well? Do you have your parts down? Have you done your leader's way first, or do you jam on every tune?

It goes both ways. For your leader to lead well, you've got to be a good follower and supporter of his/her direction. Trying doing it the way the leader wants FIRST. Don't jam!!! Then, after a few weeks, approach the leader about having a time at the END of the rehearsal where you guys can jam.

I've been in enough bands where the word "jam" is used to describe what is really nothing more than screwing around. Giving it some cool name doesn't justify the lack of discipline in the rehearsal ... in my opinion.

Perhaps if the band would follow the leader, the leader would then be able to focus on the other things that he/she is lacking in. When the tribe doesn't follow well, it can be a distraction to the chief ... who then drops the ball in other areas.

My favorite quote is:

Lead, follow, or get out of the way!
Logged

The only way to have a friend is to be one.
Thrak
Guest
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2003, 09:22 AM »

Logged
Critter29
Guest
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2003, 09:30 AM »

Thrak -

I understand where you're coming from. I've gone through the same thing as you have with band members who were rigid towards jamming. It's hard I know. Remember though, it's just a difference in personal preferences. It's neither right or wrong. You'll play with people who'll love the freedom and exploration that jamming provides and you'll play with people that only prefer a structured enviroment (i.e. songs and arrangements). However, if your leader is the one writing all the songs and supplying the vision, then your sort of obliged to go his way. If you have reservations about the overall creative direction and continue to feel unfulfilled, you can attempt to talk things out but, I wouldn't hold your breath especially, if he's already told you that he's not into jamming. In a perfect world, it'd be great for you and the other bandmates I'm sure but, save face and start a side project if need be. This way, you'll have an outlet outside of the norm. If you continue to have reservations about the creative direction and you feel that you've done everything you can to resolve it and nothing improves, your only delaying the inevitable. I've been in so many bands man and at some point through it all I had to ask myself this question: Is it worth sticking with band x or not? Remember, have fun and be happy what your doing musically because with all the other work and sacrifices it takes to be successfull, the music is sometimes the one thing that will carry you through rough times. Wink
Logged
Thrak
Guest
« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2003, 09:43 AM »

... save face and start a side project if need be. This way, you'll have an outlet outside of the norm. Remember, have fun and be happy what your doing musically because with all the other work and sacrifices it takes to be successfull, the music is sometimes the one thing that will carry you through rough times. Wink

That is something that three of us have already begun to pursue.  I just hope that it doesn't strain the relationships of him towards us.  I don't want him to feel abandoned or slighted by any means, because I enjoy his songs and want to continue to play with him.  
Maybe the side-project can be just the thing to keep everyone happy.

I love your "have fun and be happy" sound byte!

Thrak
Logged
563
supporter
Platinum Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 6612


drum + hand


WWW
« Reply #5 on: January 15, 2003, 02:24 PM »

i would like to add that the primary songwriter doesnt need to necessarily be the leader of a band.  writing music and leading a group of people are two totally different things.  ask syd barrett, dave gilmour, and roger waters Smiley

Logged

Making bad art.  Saying stupid things.  Implimenting my master plan to be forgotten when I'm gone and forgettable while I'm here.

The Luna Moth
me
Tableland
dissonance
Guest
« Reply #6 on: January 15, 2003, 08:57 PM »

as I am both a drummer and a singer/songwriter I think I can comment on this.  I love to jam and mess around with other musos when I'm on the drums - its great fun, creative and always to me feels like a great realease.  However in the situation where I'm the guitarist/singer/songwriter I can get fustrated when the rest of the band starts jamming.  Then, for whatever reason it simply feels like a waste of time - like I've been working my ass off writing these songs and arrangements etc. and all you people want to do is play whatever the hell you want...

So yeah - I love to jam when I'm on drums but if its in a situation where I've been the one writing all the songs I guess I fell like I've been creative enough already and its time to get down to business.... Wink
Logged
bentakis
Guest
« Reply #7 on: January 15, 2003, 09:28 PM »

interesting thread. I can definitely relate to the feeling about jamming being a waste of time during rehearsal. i've been in so many situations where we just jam and jam and jam, and the tunes never come together in a complete way. and when they do, the songs usually turn out formulaic and boring. can anyone else relate to this? I've come to the feeling that to get a good batch of tunes together that are interesting and have some depth and content to them, we have to force people to bring in tunes or ideas ahead of time, and keep the mindless jamming to a minimum. When I think about any of the bands that have truly great songs, songs that have shape and direction to them, it's clear that they had the discipline to concentrate on carefully structuring and performing the songs. for me, Elvis Costello, Radiohead, the Beatles, Talking Heads, Tom Waits and many more groups like this have really well thought out tunes, and it seems to me that this doesn't just come from jamming away forever.

experimenting with different approaches to playing the tunes is a different matter. I think its very useful and productive to improvise a little within the tune structure to see if the group can find smoother more creative and organic ways to go from section to section.
Logged
563
supporter
Platinum Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 6612


drum + hand


WWW
« Reply #8 on: January 16, 2003, 01:24 PM »

thought of something else.  to me, band rehersals etc are for building the band.  sometimes its rehersing the songs, other times its chatting.  as ive said a bazillion times, bands are relationships that need all the same crap any other relationship needs to flourish and be successfull.   if i couldnt hang out with my band outside of the musical environment, i wouldnt be in the band.  so what could often be contrued as time wasting is just the development of another equally important aspect of the band.  because of this, i never use rehersal spaces that limit my time like hourly spaces.  
Logged

Making bad art.  Saying stupid things.  Implimenting my master plan to be forgotten when I'm gone and forgettable while I'm here.

The Luna Moth
me
Tableland
bentakis
Guest
« Reply #9 on: January 16, 2003, 10:33 PM »

good point 563. it's important to relax and get to know your bandmates, personally and musically. jamming does a lot to show what everyone is capable of musically, which is important when writing tunes. I like to play with people I know in numerous distinct contexts if they can handle it. play straight jazz with them, experimental noise, cheesy covers, jamming, improvising. you get to really know everyone's voice.

but I do like to get down to business when its needed.
Logged
Thrak
Guest
« Reply #10 on: January 17, 2003, 09:13 AM »

Exactly Ben!  

An update on my band situation:  We sat him down for a talk, and just let out everything that was on our minds.   As a result, well... i guess i won't be working with the songwriter anymore.  None of us.
To make a long story (and conversation) short, i'll just say, there is a lot of backstory with the other three that can't be overcome.  Oh well.
My main issue was his not wanting to grow with band as a unit and really push the envelope and find out what you can do.  

So i've had a couple rehearsals with a new keyboard player, and same guitarist and bassist.  And hopefully a guitarist that I've played with for many years will also come out and play with us.

I'ts a shame, we never got to put the songs on stage.  I was craving for it.  We got some gigs scheduled about two months away, and we hope to have some new incarnation by then, albeit, unrehearsed.  I'm excited about playing with a keyboard player.  It's the first time I've had the opportunity, at least with a good keyboard player.  I only wish that he had a bigger rig to play through.  He's playing through some 12" fender guitar amp that crackles when he turns up too loud.

So, this will definitely be an open environment for a lot of experimentation, and I'm real excited about it.  Wish me luck!
Logged
563
supporter
Platinum Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 6612


drum + hand


WWW
« Reply #11 on: January 17, 2003, 10:05 AM »

if it happened now, it was bound to happen later ... and usually later equals uglier.  

congrats on the positive attitude, keep it up.
Logged

Making bad art.  Saying stupid things.  Implimenting my master plan to be forgotten when I'm gone and forgettable while I'm here.

The Luna Moth
me
Tableland
guerrillawar
Guest
« Reply #12 on: January 26, 2003, 11:07 PM »

my band isn't ready to worry about jamming in our songs,  most of our songs star by jamming and flowing together
Logged
Erwtje
Guest
« Reply #13 on: January 27, 2003, 02:51 AM »

It can be quite difficult to get all the noses in the same direction during band rehearsals... We want to get our songs right and tight, so we want to stick to the songs the way they are written.

Then again, we want to have some fun and want to experiment and 'get to know each other' as well. So we want to jam.

In my band we try to do both. First off: we know where we want to go that day. We discuss that before we rehearse. So we try to focus on three or four songs. Whenever something's not right in the song, we stop and start over, or just go over and over that one transition in the song... That's good...

When we have done that, we take some time to just jam... it's not only fun: it's the way a lot of our songs are written. We just hear somebody play something interresting, be it a nice groove, guitar-riff or whatever.
If it is good, we will work the song out at home.

Jamming is good, but if you only jam, your band will never grow... When I practise at home, I have the time to try new grooves and fills to existing songs. If I think it's better than what I used to play, I will play it and ask what the others think about it. But only if I can get it really really right. If we all like it, it's a new thingy to an old song....

This method works for us!

Erwtje
Logged
sidereal
Guest
« Reply #14 on: January 27, 2003, 10:50 AM »

I think it depends on what the process is. Are you in the songwriting stage or are you rehearsing for shows or a session? If it's the former, I'd say there's justification for experimentation. But if the songs are more or less written and you're preparing to play or record, you're better off just getting the material down solid and tight.

Regardless, as for leaders themselves, if this person is paying you, or it's understood that he is the one leading things, you gotta let him lead. This doesn't mean you can't contribute, just don't try to take over his role because that creates a mess. But if he's a leader by default and he's not leading to your satisfaction (and the band's satisfaction), then take over or take the band members with you. Mark's example of Pink Floyd is interesting. When Syd left, Roger pretty much said "okay, my show now." Smiley
Logged
Jazzman
Guest
« Reply #15 on: February 01, 2003, 10:53 PM »

I believe if you want a jam session then stay later, or everyone show up earlier to do this.  There should be a lead person in the group that has an open mind to allow the players to have a little fun playing.  But if you can't get the songs down for a gig your only kidding yourself and every song tnat you play comes out sounding different.  A leader leads a team of players to a performance level to be noticed and make some money as the goal.  He would generally get the gigs too.  But it helps if all of the members in the group participate in getting work.  That way you suddenly pay more attention to getting things right for the gigs.

Groups need to be tight, like the "Blue Angles".  These guys are aces in the air, but the manuvers that they perform are tight, and impressive.  They just don't fly around to just show off, they could kill each other out there.  The leader calls the shots, but they have a group meeting to discuss the stunts that each want to do for the show.

In essence there is a time and place for everything.  I would walk out too if the band that takes forever to get together just full around when a rehersal takes place.

If some of the members didn't show up for a rehersal, we would try to fix some playing errors on a couple of songs first.  Then we would attempt to do a couple of new songs with the players on hand.  Or we may do jam session to have fun anyway, so it wasn't a waste of time for those who made it to the session.

Just my opinion.......

My fade out..........

Jazzman
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC | Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.203 seconds with 21 queries.
Google


We currently have 16 guests and 6 members online.
Copyright ©2001 - 2008 Drummer Cafe. All rights reserved.
developed by Bart Elliott | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Site Map