|
AndyDierker
Guest
|
 |
« on: July 26, 2003, 04:01 AM » |
|
Here's the skinny. Brand new kit (and as soon as my hardware comes I'll post lots of pics... but not a minute before!), and I'm already having some tuning issues. This is my first all-maple kit, and I'm being really picky. First off, gear. These are keller tom shells - 10x8.5, 12x9, and 16x13 toms. Toms are the only thing I'm having a problem with. Heads are Aquarian double-thins as batters, and classic clears as resonants. I own and use a Drum-Dial, so you can use that to your advice-dispensing.  My big problem is coming from the 16x13. I'm looking for a low, deep "doooooooooom" sound - typical big tom sound. When I tune it low (around 70 on the resonant, on the drum dial), it sounds papery and... well, bad. I try to tune it higher, but it loses it's great floor-tom sound them. Is it my choice of heads? Should I go with something meatier? I thought the double-thins would be able to handle it. My tuning procedure is this: finger-tighten resonant lugs. Give each lug a little twist with the drum key to get it seated. Use the drum-dial to get all of the lugs around the same number with each other. Then I go through and check and adjust all the lugs by ear, tuning to the highest lug. I then tighten all the lugs just a little bit more, another 2 or 3 clicks on the drum dial. So I'm getting it just a teency bit above the lowest, meatiest note I can find. Then I flip over to the batter and do the same thing, except without the little boost at the end - so my resonant is a little bit higher than my batter. I heard this would give me more "punch" in my floor tom, and it seems to have worked - it's punchy alright, but it's crappy at the same time. I like the punch, but I want the tone! Is it better to tune the resonant a little higher or a little lower than the batter to get the sound I'm looking for? I like my floor tom to have a little punch (and I use it for a lot of beats), but still lots of low end. I think maybe any useful information on the function of the resonant head versus batter head would be helpful in helping me figure out what I'm looking to do. Like higher resonant = higher pitch, more punch, etc. etc. I like to tune from lowest to highest, so this inability to tune up my 16" gives way to a crappy sounding 12" tom. Overall, I can get a good sound out of the 12", but not in relation to the 16". I'm exagerrating all of this, to be honest. These drums sound much better than anything I've ever played (and especially owned), I'm just being picky.... and hey, I deserve to be picky! I worked for a year to afford these things. Thanks for the help, and for your patience with this huge post.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nick
Cafe VIP
Gold Member
Online
Posts: 545
“It’s because you touch yourself at night... ”
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2003, 04:26 AM » |
|
This is only a quick one as I have to bee somewhere 5 minutes ago… but if it helps I tune my maple 16” to 77 on the res. and 79 on the batter. (with DrumDial)
This is disgustingly low….
The lowest I have ever tuned even my bass drum res. is 75…
Mind you, it does sound like my 16” is good bit deeper in size, so maybe that’s it…
Cheers
N
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dead Trooper
Platinum Member
Online
Posts: 1184
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2003, 02:03 PM » |
|
It seems to me that tightening the resonant head more than your batter deadens the sound. That's what I've done for years to get more attack and louder volumes.
I would try and tune both heads to the same tension and pitch to get a more "doooooooom" sound like you discribed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It's still Rock'n'Roll to me.
The GREAT Southern Trendkill - RIP Dimebag Darrell. It's been a year already.
|
|
|
|
AndyDierker
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: July 26, 2003, 08:45 PM » |
|
I tuned up to 79/77 like Nick H's - wow - you sure you're up that high? Hehe. You have a Drum Dial and not a Rhythm Watch, right? I heard those have two different output readings. But wow... that didn't sound very low to me at all!
As for the resonant, I loosened it up and it worked a teency bit. I'm still having trouble getting a "dooooooom" isntead of a "faaaaaam." I have to be doing something wrong here.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mister Acrolite
Sous Chef
Platinum Member
Online
Posts: 5595
Mr. Sensitive
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: July 26, 2003, 09:10 PM » |
|
Somtimes it's hard to get a full tone at a low pitch when you're tuning from zero tension. Try this:
Release all the tension from the bottom head, so that the tension rods are only finger tight. Then, tighten each rod 2 full turns, working your way around the drum, starting at 12 o'clock, then 6, then 3, then 9. Then get the lugs in between, in a similar order. See if the head has a decent tone, but one that's higher than what you want. If not, repeat the process, tuning the head fairly tight. Using your ears or your drum-dial thingie, get the head in tune with itself at a fairly high pitch.
Then sit on the head (or at the very least, press down really hard with both hands). The head will stretch, and the pitch will lower. Get the head back in tune with itself, and keep pressing. Once you get it in tune with itself, start backing off the tension, making sure to do it equally on each rod. Keep stretching the head using hands or butt pressure, and gradually work your way down to a pitch you like.
For some reason it's usually easier to approach the pitch you want from above, not below. Work your way down until you have a low, fat, full tone. You want your resonant head to really sing, but it also has a huge effect on the drum's overall pitch, so it's important to spend some time getting a tone that's both full and low-pitched.
Then, flip the drum over and do the same to the top head. I usually end up with my top head looser than my bottom - the pitch difference is usually about a minor third. But thats my drums, my sizes, and my heads - you need to find the best pitch combo for yours. But try it by lowering down to pitch you want, rather than tuning up towards it. Don't know why that works, but it works for me - hope it will for you, too!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I just found out most of the recordings I'm on were actually played by Bernard Purdie. my drummerworld page
|
|
|
|
chrisso
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: July 28, 2003, 09:37 AM » |
|
Maybe you're getting too focussed on the 'drum dial' readings. I've never used one and I'm surprised to see so many 'drummercafe' members obviously relying on them. Seems to me it might be taking some of your natural faith in your own instincts away. There are many good ways to tune a drum. The only golden rule I find (especially when first learning) is to try and tune each lug equally. This is achieved by tightening every other lug in turn (or opposite lugs) around the drum. Don't worry too much about pitch at this point. When you've got all the wrinkles out of the head you can start tapping the head next to each lug. You will hear any lugs that radically differ in pitch. Adjust them (up or down) to achieve a uniform pitch around the drum. That's it basically. Once you've got the pitch of each lug tuned equally you can go anywhere you want to. As Mr A say's, try tuning the heads slightly tight at first. Apply pressure with the palms of your hands and the head will often make a snapping sound. This is the head relaxing on to the drum. You will need to recheck the equal pitch thing again at this point. Again, like Mr A I often end up with the top head (batter) as low as it will go while still 'singing' and without wrinkles. I find the bottom head should be slightly above the batter head pitch. This produces a more resonant drum. Often it is nice to control the overall pitch of the drum from the bottom head while leaving the top head without wrinkles and comfortable to play off. If all the lugs are in tune and both heads are around the same pitch or the lower head slightly higher, you will almost always have a nice sounding drum.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
felix
Cafe VIP
Platinum Member
Offline
Posts: 8656
first class all the way :-)
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: July 28, 2003, 09:49 AM » |
|
get rid of the dbl thin or dampen it with something
try a heavier two ply and swap out the stocker reso.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sonor, The Drummers Drum
|
|
|
Nick
Cafe VIP
Gold Member
Online
Posts: 545
“It’s because you touch yourself at night... ”
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: July 28, 2003, 09:55 AM » |
|
I tuned up to 79/77 like Nick H's - wow - you sure you're up that high? Hehe. You have a Drum Dial and not a Rhythm Watch, right? I heard those have two different output readings. But wow... that didn't sound very low to me at all!
I think Mr A has said every thing that needs to be said on subject of tuning by ear, but one small thing with regard to your DrumDial tuner… I think it might be incorrectly calibrated or in the wrong position on your drum head. DrumDial’s Tuning Chart can be found here:- http://www.drumdial.com/drummer.htmYou will see that 77, 79 is not really high at all for a 16”… I am sure you have already done this, but just in case, zero your drum dial by placing it on a flat piece of high quality flat glass and set it to zero on the dial. And also make sure you are the correct distance from the rim with the tuner (if it doesn’t have a gauge) as this will make a big difference. Cheers N
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Louderdb
Cafe VIP
Platinum Member
Offline
Posts: 1559
Ha!
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: July 28, 2003, 09:57 AM » |
|
I would add try a Remo Pinstripe as your batter on that drum. I've had really good results on my kit with them. My sixteen sounds like a kick drum if I mic it with a D-112! With a SM57 I still get plenty of punch and the "dooom" sound you describe. I tune with a Tama tension watch so my numbers won't match.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My pen won't work. How do I sign the www?
|
|
|
Nick
Cafe VIP
Gold Member
Online
Posts: 545
“It’s because you touch yourself at night... ”
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: July 28, 2003, 10:09 AM » |
|
Or a Aquarian Response 2 Series if you want to stick with Aquarian... I have just changed from Remo to Aquarian, and I know everyone says this... but I wouldn't go back....  N
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Christopher
supporter
Platinum Member
Offline
Posts: 2103
That's MR. Colaiuta to you...
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: July 28, 2003, 10:35 AM » |
|
As Acrolitious has said, stretch those heads. (Was I the only one that found it funny to picture him squatting on his floor tom?) I usually use the heel of my palm. butt hey! Whatever works.  [Sorry for the dumb humor.] Here's something else that may help in your tuning adventures. Get a permanent marker, a thin Sharpie works the best, and number the lugs on your heads with very small numbers. You can use these to assist you when tuning to stay in sequence. (Six, eight and ten lug drums.)    Some people just go around the drum when tuning, I think you get better results by following the above.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"What one man can do, another can do." -Charles Morse (Anthony Hopkin's character from the 1997 movie, The Edge)
|
|
|
|
paiste
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: July 28, 2003, 04:50 PM » |
|
Your ears from 3 feet away don't pick up the same sound that a microphone does 2 inches away. Also, that microphone is specially designed for certain frequencies. Floor toms that go "dooom" on recordings don't always sound the same in real life. Usually you hear a lot more smack and not as much resonance. A lot of it is microphone placement. I have evans coated g2 heads on my drums and I get a dry sound without a lot of resonance. However when I was experimenting with my cheap computer mic, I got much different sounds. Putting the mic right above the edge of the batter head I got a much more resonant drum sound because the mic picked up all that quiet ringing that normally gets lost after half a second, and then putting the mic right underneath the resonant head I got a lovely gushing warm "dooooooooom". VERY different from what my drums sound like in real life. Like another member in the cafe told me (forgot who), tune your drums to where they sound THEIR best, and let the mics and engineering take care of the rest. Good luck, and by the way, who made your drums?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
AndyDierker
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: July 28, 2003, 09:23 PM » |
|
Okay, I think I've got it figured out.
It's a combination of things. First of all, I'm tuning it too low - Nick H is right - the Drum Dial is suggested I tune it much, much higher than I currently am. That's because that's where it resonates - the Dial chart is right - that's where it sound best. But it isn't super-low, like I was expecting to hear.
Mr. A's tip helped , and I'll use that to get it pretty low. Paiste's right though - I'm going to have to get used to not getting that super-glossy recording-studio sound.
I'm going to get some new heads to help me get a little bit lower. Should I go with Response 2's, or StudioX's with dots? The rationale behind both is this: Response 2's will allow me to tune lower (being thicker 2-ply), but the StudioX's are muffled to sound better, and being single ply, will resonate more (giving my weak, piddly "thud" more of a low ring). Which do you think? Coated or no?
Sorry for all these silly questions. Getting a new drumkit and thinking you're crappy at tuning is humbling.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Louderdb
Cafe VIP
Platinum Member
Offline
Posts: 1559
Ha!
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: July 28, 2003, 10:49 PM » |
|
Your ears from 3 feet away don't pick up the same sound that a microphone does 2 inches away. Also, that microphone is specially designed for certain frequencies. Floor toms that go "dooom" on recordings don't always sound the same in real life. Usually you hear a lot more smack and not as much resonance. A lot of it is microphone placement. I have evans coated g2 heads on my drums and I get a dry sound without a lot of resonance. However when I was experimenting with my cheap computer mic, I got much different sounds. Putting the mic right above the edge of the batter head I got a much more resonant drum sound because the mic picked up all that quiet ringing that normally gets lost after half a second, and then putting the mic right underneath the resonant head I got a lovely gushing warm "dooooooooom". VERY different from what my drums sound like in real life. Like another member in the cafe told me (forgot who), tune your drums to where they sound THEIR best, and let the mics and engineering take care of the rest. Good luck, and by the way, who made your drums?
With out looking at all my posts, that sounds like something I said, but even if I didn't, it's very true and I agree 100%. I've even been suprised at my own snare sound in a recent live situation and I've NEVER been happy with the way it sounded while I played it! I let the sound guy do the mic placement EQ setting, add a bit of verb and POW! Dang thing sounded great! (Another drummer used my kit at the show and I was able to walk out front a listen) The entire kit punched and sounded warm and musical! I was thinking "dang! I tuned that kit!" Afterwards the drummer said "nice tone man"  So get the best YOU can out of tuning, then let the sound guy go from there. You'll be suprised what a good sound guy can pull out of your kit!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My pen won't work. How do I sign the www?
|
|
|
Nick
Cafe VIP
Gold Member
Online
Posts: 545
“It’s because you touch yourself at night... ”
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: July 29, 2003, 03:02 AM » |
|
Have you thought of using the Response II in conjunction with some Aquarian Studio Rings ( http://www.aquariandrumheads.com/products/display.asp?id=24 ) I have used them for years, even when I was using Pinstripes, that way you should be able to get the low sound you want with the muffling you require without choking the drum… Cheers  N
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
felix
Cafe VIP
Platinum Member
Offline
Posts: 8656
first class all the way :-)
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: July 29, 2003, 05:38 AM » |
|
I like studio x's for floors I also like Remo P3's Those are my top two favorites lately, but I like anything if it's relatively new and just "get it to work". I wouldn't sweat it. Let your record label's producer figure out your drumsound 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sonor, The Drummers Drum
|
|
|
felix
Cafe VIP
Platinum Member
Offline
Posts: 8656
first class all the way :-)
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: July 29, 2003, 05:40 AM » |
|
Subsequently, I'm not a big fan of studio rings on toms. They usually have that "buzzing" to them that drives me up the wall. Snare drums don't seem to have the problem as bad.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sonor, The Drummers Drum
|
|
|
|
AndyDierker
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: July 29, 2003, 12:22 PM » |
|
I like the muffling rings have on my toms, but I have to make sure they're resonating a LOT before I can throw some of those on - otherwise they just absolutely kill the drum.
Okay, here's my plan: pick up a 16" Studio-X with a dot, a 16" Response 2, and some rings. Whatever gives me the best sound on the floor tom, I will swap onto the entire kit. I think 563 reccomended this method a while back.
Thanks for all your help. I'll let you know how it works out for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|