|
epiarch
Guest
|
 |
« on: December 17, 2003, 10:31 AM » |
|
i am really thinking about this. ill prob make the jump up to someone's highend maple kit come tax return season  , although keeping it under $3000 for now. (shells only prob) i have looked at a lot of brands. i currently have a pearl and they are at the top of my list right now (masters) and they are almost the cheapest too. ive looked at pearl, tama, mapex, premier, (passed over yamaha -trash!!) pork pie, pacific,...i think that is it so far. when it comes down to the drums, do all of these high end sets really sound that different? when i played them, i really couldnt tell the difference. at this point is it safe to say i can base my purchase decision on looks/bang for buck/warranty/etc? i also am a firm believer that when the sets get to this level, it all comes down to the hardware...what you like best. i like no matter what, i will keep my pearl hardware and rack. nothing beats the unilock stuff. any thoughts on the drums?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BigBillInBoston
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2003, 10:58 AM » |
|
i have looked at a lot of brands. i currently have a pearl and they are at the top of my list right now (masters) and they are almost the cheapest too. ive looked at pearl, tama, mapex, premier, (passed over yamaha -trash!!) pork pie, pacific,...
Dear New Guy, You'll find many Yamaha owners on this forum (including me). Can't imagine how you could possibly call them trash  . My experience has been that they have very good quality at all price points but their high-end kits are outstanding and have been for many years. They have also long had outstanding hardware. Please note... I'm not saying there are not other good high-end kits...I'm just saying your Yamaha comment is, at a minimum, ill-informed. BigBill
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mister Acrolite
Sous Chef
Platinum Member
Online
Posts: 5646
Mr. Positive
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2003, 11:04 AM » |
|
I'll second Bill on that - calling Yamaha "trash" only points out your ignorance. They make fine drums, as do all the major manufacturers.
If you've had a bad experience with a Yamaha product, fair enough, but to suggest a brand used by some of the top professionals is "trash" is a very short-sighted oversimplification.
That said, I think the thing to base your decision on is HOW THE DRUMS SOUND. Go play a bunch of them, and buy the ones that sound best. And understand what sounds best to me is not necessarily what will sound best to you. So YOU need to do the legwork.
Make a trip to a drum shop - there are good ones scattered all over the country, within a day's drive of just about anywhere. Play some kits, listen, and make your choice that way.
But don't look for simple answers like Pearl is best, or Yamaha is trash. Both are meaningless.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mister Acrolite
Sous Chef
Platinum Member
Online
Posts: 5646
Mr. Positive
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: December 17, 2003, 11:13 AM » |
|
To continue, I DO think many of the different brands sound different from each other. Different shell thicknesses, edges, type of wood, suspension systems; all these contribute to sonic differences.
If you don't hear much difference between two specific kits, then yes, choosing based on looks, price, hardware, and other features makes sense. That's why I'll never buy a topline Sonor kit. They look and sound great, but not 3 to 5 times greater than other drums, so I won't pay 3 to 5 times as much for them!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
563
supporter
Platinum Member
Offline
Posts: 6612
drum + hand
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2003, 11:15 AM » |
|
There are differences in all of them. But the level of quality will always be high, so as Acro said, it comes to sound. As well as the looks and features you mentioned.
Gretsch and Fibes use a maple/gum/maple shell, and Gretsch paints the inside of thier shells. Same shells, different sound. Plus I think Gretsch uses a fatter edge than Fibes, but since I dont know how Fibes cuts thier edges Im not 100%.
Pearl, Tama, Mapex, etc and others use all maple shells. But they treat them differently (laquer vs polyurethane vs raw etc), and may have different bearing edges. Thus a different sound. Then theres the issue of ply count and shell thickness (not the same thing). A 4mm shell with reenforcing rings will sound different than a 6mm shell without. And an 8mm shell will sound different again.
Most custom makers use Keller shells. So again, the differences become a matter of how they treat the shells and how they cut edges.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Making bad art. Saying stupid things. Implimenting my master plan to be forgotten when I'm gone and forgettable while I'm here. The Luna MothmeTableland
|
|
|
|
epiarch
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: December 17, 2003, 11:17 AM » |
|
i have played all i listed, as stated in the post. my main problem with yamaha is everything. i have played 5 different yamaha sets, ranging from the stage series to the maple ones. i was not impressed at all with any of it. not to mention they are also high priced for what you get. their tom mounting isnt even to the rim, it still touches the shell. also, i cant stand their hardware. ALL of it i have used slips or doenst stay possitioned. the booms pivot and the tom holders do not stay in their spot. their pedals feel like nothing special at all either. not like my dw or iron cobra. you can actually feel something when you play them. now all of these problems didnt occur with each and every set i have played, but all of them had something i didnt like. b/c they are sitting 5 for 5 on the bad list, that isnt a very good ratio to have for me. when there are so many more (and better) options out there i will not waste any more of my time with them. that is my reasons. also while i may be new here at the cafe, drums and knowledge about them is not. ive been playing for 14 years and i have worked at my drum supply music store where we did stock yamaha, and most of the listed above. thats my reasons.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mister Acrolite
Sous Chef
Platinum Member
Online
Posts: 5646
Mr. Positive
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: December 17, 2003, 11:31 AM » |
|
i have played all i listed, as stated in the post. my main problem with yamaha is everything. i have played 5 different yamaha sets, ranging from the stage series to the maple ones. i was not impressed at all with any of it. not to mention they are also high priced for what you get. their tom mounting isnt even to the rim, it still touches the shell. also, i cant stand their hardware. ALL of it i have used slips or doenst stay possitioned. the booms pivot and the tom holders do not stay in their spot. their pedals feel like nothing special at all either. not like my dw or iron cobra. you can actually feel something when you play them. now all of these problems didnt occur with each and every set i have played, but all of them had something i didnt like. b/c they are sitting 5 for 5 on the bad list, that isnt a very good ratio to have for me. when there are so many more (and better) options out there i will not waste any more of my time with them. that is my reasons. also while i may be new here at the cafe, drums and knowledge about them is not. ive been playing for 14 years and i have worked at my drum supply music store where we did stock yamaha, and most of the listed above. thats my reasons.
Fair enough. So that's one brand you don't need to investigate - they're officially crossed off the list - for YOU. But what you just wrote is a far more rational explanation than saying Dave Weckl's drums are trash.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nubert Thump
supporter
Gold Member
Offline
Posts: 522
Splashes?...We don't need no stinkin' splashes!
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: December 17, 2003, 11:31 AM » |
|
i am really thinking about this. ill prob make the jump up to someone's highend maple kit come tax return season  , although keeping it under $3000 for now. (shells only prob) i have looked at a lot of brands. i currently have a pearl and they are at the top of my list right now (masters) and they are almost the cheapest too. ive looked at pearl, tama, mapex, premier, (passed over yamaha -trash!!) pork pie, pacific,...i think that is it so far. when it comes down to the drums, do all of these high end sets really sound that different? when i played them, i really couldnt tell the difference. at this point is it safe to say i can base my purchase decision on looks/bang for buck/warranty/etc? i also am a firm believer that when the sets get to this level, it all comes down to the hardware...what you like best. i like no matter what, i will keep my pearl hardware and rack. nothing beats the unilock stuff. any thoughts on the drums? I really can't tell what you are really trying to find out here. It seems that you have already made up your mind and I doubt that someone else can post anything here that would switch you from Pearl to, let's say, Tama or Mapex or DW, and certainly not Yamaha. That said, I do not find any problem with your choice of Pearl Masters if that is what you like. You are the one that has to be happy with your purchase. While the high end of all the major drum manufacturers are very good that doesn't mean they all sound the same. When I try out a set of Tama Starclassic Maple then go sit behind Mapex Orion or Sonor or Premiers or DW I can hear a differences. It is not a qualitative difference but rather a characteristic difference that makes the sound of that particular brand. This leads to a choice of taste. If, when you try different brands of high end drum kits, you do not hear any differences it is either due to your own hearing ability or the style of your playing. I do not suggest this as an insult to you, but only that if this is the case your choice is even easier than to a player who let's say is more sensitive to the subtle differences between kits. For example--a drummer loves the BD from one kit, the rack toms from another and the floor tom of yet another--and hardware of another. If you don't find yourself in this kind of dilemma then get the kit with the best hardware/bang for the buck/Pear Masters and be happy.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Nubert Thump ==Have Sticks, Will Travel(but not too far!)==
Just heard GMS CL Dums--wow they sounded great!
|
|
|
|
epiarch
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: December 17, 2003, 11:49 AM » |
|
honestly, pearl is at the top b/c it is the cheapest for the drums. BUT tama a mapex are right up there. i would probably get any of the in a heart beat, but i just cant do that! i do hear differences, but i am not totally sure if that is b/c of how they are tuned/brand and kind of head used/ or the different sizes of the drums. i wish i could just get a bunch lined up with all of the same sizes, heads, etc and play. i guess that is my main question or concern. given these restrictions, how much different would they sound from each other? (i know they will some...)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
diddle
supporter
Gold Member
Online
Posts: 673
I love to play chess and sip coffee!
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: December 17, 2003, 11:49 AM » |
|
i am really thinking about this. ... when it comes down to the drums, do all of these high end sets really sound that different? I've studied this subject alot, as I find it very interesting. Yes, there CAN be a big difference in sound from one drum to another. What factors influence the total sound, you ask? 70% of the drum's sound comes from the type of bearing edge, while the remaining 30% is influenced by the shell composition. (I'm referring to the things you can't control as opposed to things you can, such as heads or tuning) Bearing edges come in a few standard types, such as single/double 45 or 35, or round. In general, sharper edges produce more attack while round edges create more mello tone (and easier to tune). And round edges will tune over a wider range. Most high-end kits use maple shells. Maple tends to create a warmer, more mellow sound with good sustain. And these higher-end kits normally are easier to tune than low-end ones (such as luan) One final note: Shell thickness... Thinner ones vibrate more and thicker ones create more highs (brighter tone). A thick snare (such as 20ply) produces more "crack".
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mister Acrolite
Sous Chef
Platinum Member
Online
Posts: 5646
Mr. Positive
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: December 17, 2003, 11:56 AM » |
|
One other thing - and I think this is perfectly valid - is the Pitter-Pat Factor (PPF). Which kit, when you just stand there and LOOK at it, makes your heart go pitter-pat?  Some brands just don't do that to me, regardless of how nicely built they are. So I don't buy them. If you get to a point where a couple kits are both sounding really good to you, that's when the PPF comes in.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Louis
Cafe VIP
Platinum Member
Online
Posts: 5881
Will Drum for BBQ
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: December 17, 2003, 12:13 PM » |
|
One other thing - and I think this is perfectly valid - is the Pitter-Pat Factor (PPF). That is the main thing that keeps so many drum makers in business gentlemen.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
No one will believe it's the "Blues" if you wear a suit, 'less you happen to be an old person, and you slept in it last night!
|
|
|
Chris Whitten
Honorary Cafe VIP
Platinum Member
Online
Posts: 5901
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: December 17, 2003, 12:18 PM » |
|
I'm somewhat symathetic to Epiarch. Let's face it, it's a big investment with lots of ramifications. I for one have never been able to base any decisions on awkwardly demoing a kit in a showroom, with lots of other drums resonating and buzzing in sympathy and the added frustration of the glaring salespeople who either can't wait for you to shut up or who seem to be thinking 'this dude can't play s**t'! It's like buying a new car based solely on sitting in it in the showroom. So, like Epiarch, I'd be interested to hear any kit buying strategies or more advice on what people think about various brands. Having said all that......I'd be looking at the 'boutique' brands. Seems like you get great personal advice and customisation options from the people who actually build drums themselves. Plus I think the after sales customer service is usually excellent. I'm thinking, Tempus, Stanbridge, Pork Pie... chip in anytime you guy's! I'm basically out of touch.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
diddle
supporter
Gold Member
Online
Posts: 673
I love to play chess and sip coffee!
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: December 17, 2003, 12:20 PM » |
|
Some time ago I purchased a "high-end" kit and had it in my drum room sitting next to my old "low-end" kit. When my dad saw them, he said "why did you buy another set"... and "how much more did you pay for those?"... hehe
To the non-drummer, one set looks and sounds just like the other
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BigBillInBoston
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: December 17, 2003, 12:21 PM » |
|
i have played all i listed, as stated in the post. my main problem with yamaha is everything. i have played 5 different yamaha sets, ranging from the stage series to the maple ones. i was not impressed at all with any of it. not to mention they are also high priced for what you get. their tom mounting isnt even to the rim, it still touches the shell. also, i cant stand their hardware. ALL of it i have used slips or doenst stay possitioned. the booms pivot and the tom holders do not stay in their spot. their pedals feel like nothing special at all either. Thanks for your specific concerns about Yamaha. I happen to agree that in my experience the pedals and hihats are OK but not outstanding. Still don't get the hardware comment though...Mine is easy to set-up and stays in place very well with no slippage. Were you playing the Yamaha sets you've tried or climbing on them? Regarding the tom mounts, I like the YESS mounting system but you don't. I'm not convinced the shells would resonate more if the mounts were different but it's clearly a matter of taste. I do like the sleeker/more compact look of them relative to many of the rim-mounted options on other kits. PS- How long have you lived in Ames? I'm from Iowa originally and went to school @ ISU. Are you associated with the University? BigBill
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mister Acrolite
Sous Chef
Platinum Member
Online
Posts: 5646
Mr. Positive
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: December 17, 2003, 12:28 PM » |
|
Chrisso raises a good point. I worked in drum shops a lot in my 20's and 30's and became immune to the things he talked about, but those factors do exist.
So I'll pitch in with my faves - these are the best sounding new drums I've played recently:
Fibes (the wood ones) Yamaha Maple Custom Absolute (trash or not) Pork Pie Tempus
I also like some of the Tama Starclassics I've heard, as well as Pearl's maple drums. I also love the kits Resurrection Drums builds, which are Keller-based drums customized to your tastes.
Qualifications: I've NEVER heard a Fibes kit that didn't absolutely KILL me. I've only heard one Pork Pie, but it killed me, too. And one of my fave local drummers plays all Tempus, and his drums always sound amazing. I play rental Yamahas all the time, and have excellent luck with them.
Drums I would NOT buy: DW (too inconsistent), upper-level Sonor (way too pricey), Premier (not loud enough), Mapex (no pitter-patter) - again, all just personal observations; no hard scientific facts here.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
diddle
supporter
Gold Member
Online
Posts: 673
I love to play chess and sip coffee!
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: December 17, 2003, 12:35 PM » |
|
My favorite name brands are 1) Tama Starclassic, and 2) Yamaha Maple Custom Absolute. I'm waiting for my new custom set to ship tomarrow (been on order for 12 weeks!) from MedicineMan Drums (one of those custom shops using Keller shells). The Ludwig Classic Maple (4pc set) caught my eye recently, but havn't had a chance to check em out yet. I love the 13" and 16" toms! Interstate music had a Ringo-looking (black oyster) set for less than $1600 listed in their catalog. My least favorite are Pearl and DW. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris Whitten
Honorary Cafe VIP
Platinum Member
Online
Posts: 5901
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: December 17, 2003, 12:51 PM » |
|
While we're at it I have another question... Do we have to argue about the merits of hardware packages and drums combined? I honestly don't know how it works in the States. The last time I bought a complete package was around 1985 (Pearl BLX, plus all the hardware). After that I only bought 'boutique' drums (Noble & Cooley) and chose whatever harware suited my fancy - Pearl Rack and DW bits...then later just all DW hardware, which I'm still using. IMO, there are some definite hardware standouts. Agreeing with Mr A, I've heard nothing but good things about Fibes and Tempus. My best drumming buddy uses Mapex (although they don't do 'it' for me), the same buddy also highly recommended Pork Pie to me. I'm NOT a fan of Premier and I'm currently off Japanese drums - just my silly opinion I know. In your position I'd probably buy a superb hardware package (inc RIMS) new and the best used shells I could afford. In a way, buying new shells is like buying a new car. Yes you get to choose the colour, but they quarter in value the minute you take delivery. There are some excellent shell packs around (which have literally just been unwrapped), not to mention the awesome cornucopia of vintage shells to choose from.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
felix
Cafe VIP
Platinum Member
Online
Posts: 8753
Y no keno!
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: December 17, 2003, 01:08 PM » |
|
Three grand?
Yamaha for me- super consistent. Love the yamaha/ maple sound. It is what it is, all the time it seems. Easy to get parts but I have never had anything besides a dfp foot pedal spring break. I too worked in a drumshop that carried maple customs and the pearl masters- the m/c's were always a more balanced and refined drumset I thought.
The good thing about dw is *at least I think* you can go to any guitar center or sam ash and play at least 3 of them! Plus they look GREAT! I had a couple of problems with my dw's but I abused that kit.
I like yamaha hat stands. I've worn out two dbl pedals from them (foot plate hinges), but they were the dfp models- don't know about that new "dragon thing" out there.
I think the "old" sonor sound is pretty awesome (my fav) but there are problems being a sonor lover. Even though the high line kits are pricey, the delite kits aren't unreasonable. I just think they sound (delights and s class) like everything else now *I'm not a maple fan*- parts will be a wait
You have to have the pitter patter effect and usually for me it's the look and the price of the kit. If I'm lucky enough to get a good sound *let's be real, it takes awhile to get to really know what you kit can and can't do sonically- which drum is the problem child etc.* after a year I'll keep it. My last 3 or 4 kits were all either used or discontinued ($1000 kits)
I hate the tama starclassic sound- way too hollow for me- just an opinion. Fantastic drums and hardware, just not my sound.
Gretsch drums I've noticed seem to be on the dry side and a little more retro sounding for my taste.
Nobody has fibes kits around here- so I've never played one; once in awhile a noble and cooley shows up in the drum shop (tons of sustain)
I also like ludwig drums (kinda retro sounding also) cause usually the parts aren't hard to find either. Plus you get the name everyone seems to identify with.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yaay!
|
|
|
|
SheldonWhite
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: December 17, 2003, 01:30 PM » |
|
Three grand?
Yamaha for me- super consistent. Love the yamaha/ maple sound. It is what it is, all the time it seems. Easy to get parts but I have never had anything besides a dfp foot pedal spring break. I too worked in a drumshop that carried maple customs and the pearl masters- the m/c's were always a more balanced and refined drumset I thought.
I also love Yamaha. The MapCustAbs drums sound great, and their hardware is (IMO) excellent. Lots of nice design features, and I've never had anything break. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|