|
bangdums
Guest
|
 |
« on: July 15, 2002, 06:49 AM » |
|
I have been playing drums as a hobby for about 14 years (since 8th grade). I played triples/quads throughout high school with a little jazz band in there and I now play for my church worship band. I just recently really started seriously practicing again, mostly on a practice pad at home because I don't have anyplace to keep a set at my house right now.
Anyway, I have been working through Stick Control and am really kind of taking a step back to the basics, scrutinizing my grip, stroke, tempo, etc. stuff I haven't really focused on since high school. So I noticed that when I play, for example, the first excercise in stick control (RLRLRL, etc..) that my natural inclination is to keep my sticks at rest about a 1/2 to 1 inch above the playing surface (a "ready position"). Then when I play the stroke, I raise the stick up to whatever hieght will give me the volume I want, then proceed to strike the surface, then return the stick to the "ready position". I do this with each stroke I take.
My questions is (and maybe I am overanlayzing myself), is this the correct way to do this, or should I, after playing a given stroke, be returning the stick to the height from which I need to begin the stroke to give me the volume I am wanting to play, or is returning the stick to the "ready position" ok? In other words, should each stroke be a full stroke. As I played these excercises, it occurred to me that by returning to the "ready position", it is somehwat inefficient to raise the stick and then strike the surface. If I am always starting with the stick at the height I want, then I am eliminating the action of raising the stick up at the beginning ofeach stroke I take.
I have read Bart's lesson on the 4 stroke types, and I guess technically I am playing a downstroke each time I play a stroke, but not really intentionally. I mean, I realize that one could consciously practice downstrokes with these excercisex, but I am not consciously doing that, it is just what I currently do by default (who knows why!).
Any insight would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bart Elliott
Chef de Cuisine
Platinum Member
Online
Posts: 12342
Groovin' on "Cissy Strut"!
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2002, 07:40 AM » |
|
You're correct to always return to the rest position.
If you are playing slowly, the sticks will naturally return to the resting position ... or at least they should. But ... when you start to increase the speed at which you are playing (let's say you are playing straight 8th notes ... from pages 3-5 of Stick Control), there's a point where the sticks are always in motion ... for sticking like R L R L ... etc.
Now, when you start playing various stickings ... such as R L R R L R L L ... you will not return to resting postion because the sticks are going to be in motion.
The stroke types are going to come more into play when you are using accents or various dynamics. Stick Control doesn't make use of accents (on the written page) ... so if you play a paradiddle (see page 3, number 5) it's a single paradiddle sticking but not the single paradiddle rudiment. The Single Paradiddle, as a rudiment, incorporates accents ... so technically, if you don't play accents with this sticking ... it's not THE rudiment ... but the sticking.
So .... with Stick Control ... using no accents, you could state the following:
When playing slow (but not soft), you'll be using Down Strokes. Fast (but not soft), you'll be using Full Strokes.
When playing slow or fast at soft volumes, you'll be using Tap Strokes.
Remember ... we use Full Strokes for loud hits and Tap Strokes for soft hits. The Down and Up strokes are what I call transitional strokes in that they are used to get you to correct position to play a Full or Tap ... if you are switching between loud or soft ... which you would do in the case of accents. So technically you should NOT be using any stroke(s) accept Full and Tap strokes ... unless of course that you are playing so slow that your sticks would have to be suspended in the air, waiting to be used again. Think of it as a combination of the proper stroke type, along with being at rest or relaxed. If the stick is not in motion, it should be at rest.
This is my teaching method (Moeller) and how I approach this topic. I'm sure there are others who have different venues or opinions on the topic. Hope this helps!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Life is a beauty contest; whatever wins your heart ... wins your life.
|
|
|
|
bangdums
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2002, 07:45 AM » |
|
Thanks. This helps a lot. I suspected I was doing it right. It just felt more natural and comfortable. Your explanation of the stick being in motion vs/ not and how that affects the stroke was particularly helpful. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SteveG
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2002, 12:09 PM » |
|
bangdrums, you should never be pulling the stick away from the head unless you are preparing to play an accented note. Allow the stick to rebound off of the drumhead naturally. You are virtually throwing the stick down at the head and allowing it to rebound naturally. The rebound will always be faster than you pulling the stick away. When going from an unaccented to accented note, the stick should be moving into position for the accent prior to the accented down stroke (I know, duh), not waiting to the last possible moment to pull the stick up. I know this might sound obvious but that technique is not taught or learned by every drummer. You can use the Moeller technique to produce the accented stroke or a modified Moreller where the Moeller whipped stroke isn't as pronounced. Joe Morello's Master Studies pages 7,8 and 9 go through a series of exercises that transition between accented and unaccented notes.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rlhubley
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: July 18, 2002, 09:18 AM » |
|
I'm with steve on this. For stick control, w/out accents, you will use all 3 of the basic strokes, full stroke, down stroke, and up stroke. On p.1, #1, you will only use full strokes, which means starting and ending the stroke in the same place. 1 inch above the head will generally be meant for very soft dynamics, 6 inches makes a nice mf sound(not mother f'er, mezzo forte!) . I can expand on this stroke if needed but ending the stroke in the same place is it in a nutshell. Down strokes start from one spot and end at one inch above the head. These are usful for an accented note that is followed by an unaccented note(in the same hand), accented paradiddles are a perfect example. The upstroke is starting down low like at one inch, and ending up high(height determined by dynamic). These are perfect when playing an unaccented note that is followed by an accented note( in the same hand), again accented paradiddles make great use of this.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bangdums
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: July 18, 2002, 09:45 AM » |
|
On p.1, #1, you will only use full strokes, which means starting and ending the stroke in the same place I think Bart hit the nail on the head when he said that this would only apply at faster tempos. At slow tempos, the stick naturally returns to the at rest position. Bottom line - based on all these responses, I realized that what I am naturally doing is correct. I was never really taught these things so much in words as just by doing and watching others. To me, a lot of things in drumming are just doing what makes sense without thinking about it too much. Thanks everyone for the valuable insight!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rlhubley
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: July 18, 2002, 10:02 AM » |
|
Bart is right when he says to always return to the rest position. However, when playing a series of unaccented notes, on the same surface, I FIRMLY believe the best technique for this is to drop the stick and let the stick bounce back up to the rest position. I do NOT think a lift before the note is neccessary, and in fact I believe it is an unwise choice. Just my opinion though.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bangdums
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: July 18, 2002, 10:06 AM » |
|
I do NOT think a lift before the note is neccessary, and in fact I believe it is an unwise choice. Just my opinion though.
I'm not sure I understand exactly what you are saying. If you let the stick rebound to the rest position, but are playing more than a tap stroke, wouldn't you have to lift the stick to play the next stroke (with the same hand)?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rlhubley
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: July 18, 2002, 10:18 AM » |
|
Basically I am saying that you should start and end the stroke at the same height(the rest position). If you are starting the stroke at 6 inches above the head(a good mf height) there is no need to lift the stick before you drop the stick downward.
An experiment I suggest you use: Required material: a ball that bounces, preferabley a tennis ball or basket ball
Bounce the ball with one hand on the ground. Repeat a couple of times. Now just dribble the ball as if you were playing basket ball. Notice, how many times you carry the ball up higher before you toss it down. Here's the number of times that happens: ZERO!! Reason, gravity. This applies 100% to drumming. It simply takes less energy to work with gravity than it does to work against gravity. Tossing the stick down will creat an equal but opposite reaction, which means it will bounce right back up to where it was tossed from. The pre-stroke lift does not affect the sound in any positive of negative way. Audibly, one can NOT tell if there is a pre-stroke lift. The pre-stroke lift serves no purpose in a series of notes played at the same dynamic level. It is a waist of energy and time.
I also thought I would type up a good stick height to dynamic result chart:
1" = pp to ppp 3" = p 4" - 6" = mf 9" = f 12"= ff to fff
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bangdums
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: July 18, 2002, 10:37 AM » |
|
This is how I see it:
Say we are playing alternating 8th notes at a slow tempo (RLRL etc). Say we are playing strokes with a 6 inch height. You toss the stick down with the right hand from 6 inches and it rebounds, and you catch it in the rest position (1 inch above the head). Meanwhile, the oleft hand performs its stroke while the right hand briefly rests until ready for its next stroke, for which you must then lift the stick to 6 inches (because it was waiting in the rest position - one inch above the head) and toss it down again.
Or are we saying that you toss the stick from 6 inches, it rebounds and you catch it at 6 inches. It then rests briefly at 6 inches above the head (remember at a slow tempo) until ready for the next stroke. To me, this is the only way you can avoid a pre-stroke lift.
Now at faster tempos, as Bart pointed out, the sticks are essentially always in motion, so no time for the brief rest at one inch above the head, it just rebounds to 6 inches and goes right into the next stroke.
Boy this is really difficult to discuss without being able to show each other what we mean! I'm enjoying this discussion though!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rlhubley
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: July 18, 2002, 10:53 AM » |
|
start from 6 inches, end at 6 inches, then your rest position is at 6 inches, which does eliminate the lift(as you said).
Now at faster strokes, the rest is virtually eliminated yes. However, the sticks still bounce back to the point that they started from.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bangdums
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: July 24, 2002, 09:43 AM » |
|
That's interesting. I was never taught that. So, it seems that neither technique is necessarily incorrect - just used for developing different skills (dynamic control vs. speed/strength/stamina). So perhaps practiciing both ways would be good for developing both sets of skills.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bangdums
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: July 24, 2002, 10:20 AM » |
|
Thanks for the advice and encouragement. I'll give it a try (as much as I can - daily practice seems to elude me with a 2 year old and 6 month old at home!)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bangdums
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: July 24, 2002, 10:37 AM » |
|
A little too much bounce for me. Their little 2 year old heads are pretty thick if you know what I mean.  You gotta love 'em though!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bart Elliott
Chef de Cuisine
Platinum Member
Online
Posts: 12342
Groovin' on "Cissy Strut"!
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: July 24, 2002, 12:08 PM » |
|
I disagree with most of the responses to your question. The practice technique you describe is one way to practice - for dynamic control - which, in my opinion, is a more advanced technique.
My first drum lessons was with a great bebop drummer, Steve Bagby. He explained to me that the muscles in the hands and forearms were like machines and had to be worked out and developed to perform a specific task, just like an athlete trains his/her muscles to perform certain tasks whether its to increase stamina or strength or both. He showed me the basic technique for developing the hands and forearms in which the starting position was to hold the sticks straight up. I would then practice the rudiments with this starting position beginning at about 1 stroke per second and returning to the straight up position after each stroke. Very slowly I increase the speed. At some point you cannot return to a straight up position, but, throughout the exercise you continue to return the sticks to a position as high as possible. I would then continue to increase the speed until I reach the point where I was on the edge of my ability to keep the sticks under control. I then, very slowly reduce the speed back to about 1 stroke per second. As the speed decreases, the stick height increases until you return to the straight up position. Over time, the hands and forearms strengthen, the stamina improves and the speed at which lyou can keep the sticks under control increases and the amount of time you can maintain top speed increases. This prctice technique is the most basic and is designed to build speed, strength, stamina and control (over speed) ie: we all know drummers who can play a decent 16th note double stroke roll at 220 BPM but then if they try to do it at 180 there's no uniformity.
The practice technique you're talking about (if I understand you correctly) is a more advanced technique to develop dynamic control. What you are describing is a PRACTICE technique ONLY .... which you even label it as. Most of us here are very familiar with what you've described. In fact, I first learned of this technique via Joe Morello. The ONLY reason you would use this PRACTICE technique is for PRACTICE; developing the muscles and learning to fly back. When you do this, your are supposed to keep the fingers wrapped around the stick so that you get a full work-out and really force all the muscles involved to be used. Anyway, I have been working through Stick Control and am really kind of taking a step back to the basics, scrutinizing my grip, stroke, tempo, etc. stuff I haven't really focused on since high school. So I noticed that when I play, for example, the first excercise in stick control (RLRLRL, etc..) that my natural inclination is to keep my sticks at rest about a 1/2 to 1 inch above the playing surface (a "ready position"). Then when I play the stroke, I raise the stick up to whatever hieght will give me the volume I want, then proceed to strike the surface, then return the stick to the "ready position". I do this with each stroke I take.
My questions is (and maybe I am overanlayzing myself), is this the correct way to do this, or should I, after playing a given stroke, be returning the stick to the height from which I need to begin the stroke to give me the volume I am wanting to play, or is returning the stick to the "ready position" ok? In other words, should each stroke be a full stroke. As I played these excercises, it occurred to me that by returning to the "ready position", it is somehwat inefficient to raise the stick and then strike the surface. If I am always starting with the stick at the height I want, then I am eliminating the action of raising the stick up at the beginning ofeach stroke I take. I don't see where the original post for this thread implies about using a "practice" technique. If anything, the lifting the stick thing is advanced because it's not a normal playing method, but rather a way to develop muscles, etc. What I've described in my initial response is basic playing technique via Moeller Method; what someone would use in everyday playing. I don't know too many people that play with their sticks always pointing at the ceiling (well ... except for Felix ... see photo, click here!). If you want to work out the muscles ... that's great. But you can't play accents or fundamental rudiments this way ... only monophonic strokes, stickings and rhythmic figures. This technique is NOT for basic playing ... which is what I believe the opening post on this topic was addressing. So Ratamatatt ... I'm not attacking you, but want to make it very clear for all those who may read this thread that what you have described is a valid PRACTICE technique, just like playing on a pillow would be another PRACTICE technique ... but neither are PLAYING techniques. Just wanted to clarify all of this. If I misunderstood the original post, then I apologize. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Life is a beauty contest; whatever wins your heart ... wins your life.
|
|
|
|
bangdums
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: July 24, 2002, 12:19 PM » |
|
This technique is NOT for basic playing ... which is what I believe the opening post on this topic was addressing. Well I guess I really didn't think about the difference between practice technique and playing technique. What I was doing in practice and what I described in the original post, as it turns out, apparently was playing technique. Just wanted to clarify all of this. If I misunderstood the original post, then I apologize.  No you didn't misunderstand. I think in my original post, I was kind of like looking through the keyhole, so to speak. I now feel like the door has been opened, so this has been a great dialogue and I have learned a lot. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
felix
Cafe VIP
Platinum Member
Online
Posts: 8586
first class all the way :-)
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: July 24, 2002, 01:00 PM » |
|
well ... except for Felix I resemble that remark. At least my shirt is on. Hey, at least it's better than this pic that we got from another source. It actually looks as if I'm pleasuring myself! (And how would I know what that looks like? Ok, shut up, I said it for y'all). Incredibly embarrassing. It is amazing what people think looks cool. I have to go thru 3 video tapes of my playing this weekend (our manager is a tyrant!).... this is going to be incredibly painful to sit through. Who cares what stroke you are using...learn how to do it the "proper" way (whatever that is) but ultimately I think you are going to be yourself anyways. Just make the music sound awesome and have some fun. Try not to look like a geek and keep a good groove, keep your shirt on and make sure your makeup isn't running 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sonor, The Drummers Drum
|
|
|
|
rlhubley
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: July 25, 2002, 10:11 AM » |
|
I still disagree with the "lift before you play" technique. It is a waste of motion, energy, and time.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bart Elliott
Chef de Cuisine
Platinum Member
Online
Posts: 12342
Groovin' on "Cissy Strut"!
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: July 25, 2002, 11:43 AM » |
|
Bart, I totally disagree. First the practice techniqe I described is a legitamate playing technique. I think the proper "ready" position generally is with the sticks straight up or as high as the tempo will allow in between strokes and the dynamics call for. Grace notes, would be an exception to this general rule. For example, if you are playing a drag, only the right hand returns to the straight up ready position. If you are playing a pp drag, then in that case you would raise the right hand to the appropriate height to obtain the desired volume. If you are playing a flam, then the hand playing the grace note stays parellel to the drum head and the opposite hand returns to the srtraight up ready position.
In my opinion, Felix' stick position in your picture is the proper ready position excepting grace notes, or dynamics other than fortisimo (which I don't imagine is in Felix' repetoir anyway). I'm sorry, but I think you are out of your mind man. If that is a valid playing technique then I have learned nothing in all these years of playing. I don't know of any accomplished players who actually play like that. If you need to play loud then you pick the sticks up, but you don't just sit there with the sticks pointing in the air. Come on now. You're burning calories holding the sticks up like that ... so it's hardly a "resting position". What you describe makes no sense. How can you play soft? You would have to throw the stick down really fast, stop just before it hits the drum, then make a little tap for the grace note of the flam. You keep talking about returning to the up position and making exceptions for soft strokes .... well how do you play a soft stroke QUICKLY if your sticks are always pointing up in a resting position. To me, that's absurd! It's not a legitimate "playing" technique to keep your sticks pointing at the ceiling when you are not playing. That's what we are talking about. From the resting position you would move your sticks where they need to be in order to play. I'd love for anyone to educate me in the validity of the "playing" technique Ratamatt has described. Please understand ... I do exactly what he has described for working on muscle strength and snapping the sticks. Helps me to be able raise my sticks very quickly for an accent ... and VERY helpful in developing shuffles such as the Texas Shuffle. I've never seen anyone play with their sticks pointing straight as their resting position. Maybe people that ONLY play loud would use this ... but it's not something I've ever seen. Where not playing that "Whack A Mole" game at the arcade here ... we are playing a musical instrument. I could sit here and argue my point ... but I'm not wanting to get into all of this because to me it's absolutely silly. Sorry ... not trying to be disrespectful or insulting ... but I'm don't know what else to say. Tell me who teaches like this, and give me some names of professional players that I might know who play like this. I want to learn what I'm missing here if this is indeed a valid playing technique. This whole concept goes against everything I've ever researched, studied, taught or done in my life. Sorry to be so resistant ... but it just seems crazy to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Life is a beauty contest; whatever wins your heart ... wins your life.
|
|
|
|
sidereal
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: July 30, 2002, 12:22 PM » |
|
Wow, for the first page of this thread, I thought I was in Bizarro Drummer Cafe land. 6 inches above the pad!? Then Rattamatatt said what I was gonna say, cept I agree with Bart that this is a practice technique, not a playing technique.
I assumed the initial question was about developing a better stroke by working with a pad and working with Stick Control. If this is the case, Ratt's right. Hold the sticks perpendicular to the pad as a way of developing the muscles and getting a better stroke. This is the way I learned it with all three teachers I've had. My previous teacher did nothing but focus on my grip and stroke for 5 months, and he was a nazi about it. Always bring the stick up perpendicular to the pad when working on German or American grip at slow to moderate tempos on a practice pad. Now I'm taking advanced jazz lessons and my new teacher said the same thing.
So my point is that when working on a pad, in an effort to improve your stroke, use Ratt's method: bring the stick back perpendicular to the pad with every stroke. When playing the drum kit, Bart, Robert and Steve are right: play naturally and utilize the natural bounce to your advantage.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|