• Welcome to Drummer Cafe Community Forum.

Epiphany

Started by Rylie, April 07, 2006, 09:58 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Big Yummy

QuoteIf you don't recognize the talent behind today's pop stars then you don't understand music.

Oh yeah.  That Britney Spears stuff is just too much for me to wrap my noodle around.

C'mon.  This is like trying to tell me I should respect sitcom writers as literary giants or respect the fine cuisine of McDonalds.  Some big brains went into bringing us those fine products.  They're still garbage.

Ryan Culberson

Quote from: Warren Peese on April 07, 2006, 09:58 PM
This may be obvious or perhaps silly to you more experienced drummers, but while watching a video of a drummer playing a 4 piece bop set and sounding as busy as a Bonham solo, I decided to rearrange my standard (12/13/16) set and eliminate the 13" tom so it's more like a bop arrangement - drum sizes notwithstanding.

This obviously allowed me to move the ride cymbal closer and lower, drop the 12" tom as low as it will go, bring my 18" crash (on the right) to an easier to reach spot / height, and all of a sudden I'm actually comfortable behind the set and I'm able to move around it better...and obviously faster.

Boredom can be productive. Go figure.

Hey Warren,

These epiphanies can be mind-boggling, can't they?  My own epiphany went the other way (just to illustrate the individual nature of the drums)...  

For most of my playing life I used a 4-piece kit.  I always felt a "cramped" feeling while practicing or gigging.  In 2004 I switched to a 5-piece kit (with 2 toms over bass drum) and found that I preferred that set up much more than the 4-piece with the ride close in.  

To make a long story short, I have MONKEY arms (my wife calls me "knuckle-dragger")!  For me, having the ride cymbal further away feels more comfortable, and I chalk that up to the abnormal length of my arms.  So moving the ride further out opened a hole for me that I gladly filled in with another drum.  

Big Yummy

Back to the topic:

I find the smaller kit far more ergonomic.  Set-up and tear-down are easier.  The kit is easier to transport.  The kit eats up less space on stage.  There's less "cross-talk" between the drums.  Less mic's are required.   Less money is required.

Also, the drummer is much more visible.  (In my case, I'm not sure that's such a good thing.)

The monster kits are great for monster drummers.  I've seen many a bar rocker hiding behind a monster kit while he played bass and snare all night.  Why bother with the extra gear?  When Neil Peart rolls across the toms, though,  we hear the virtues of the monster kit.

I remember seeing Rush back in the day and even from the edge of the stage I couldn't see a thing Peart was doing.  He had absolutely no presence on stage at all - just a wall of drums.  Now he has a better set-up, mechanized risers, rear screen projection, etc., so he has a huge stage presence.

So, if you're a monster drummer in a monster venue with a monster stage apparatus, the monster kit makes sense.  Otherwise, it's hard to justify.

Tony

Quote from: TMe on April 10, 2006, 08:37 PM
Oh yeah.  That Britney Spears stuff is just too much for me to wrap my noodle around.

C'mon.  This is like trying to tell me I should respect sitcom writers as literary giants or respect the fine cuisine of McDonalds.  Some big brains went into bringing us those fine products.  They're still garbage.

OK.  Thanks for your thoughts.  Have a nice day :)

Lori

Always an interesting topic of discussion and thank goodness for the edit button, huh? It's funny someone should mention the songwriter's behind the songs. I have a few favorite songwriters and though they are not exactly "famous" they are incredible. Yesterday I searched for one, Matraca Berg. It's country, I guess, and never realized how many hit songs for country artists she had written.  I just loved her songs and her singing them. I found out from her site about all the hits. Wow. I would honestly not mind writing songs for others. These are great songs and her royalties are gonna pay for whatever she wants to record and experiment with on her own. And her songs get to be heard.  Music is such a fascinating never ending exploration of unexplainable phenomena. To me. You couldn't really put your finger on it if you tried. You can grow forever in music if you choose to. Some music outlasts most of us and maybe generations to come. And generations before us. But it's kinda fun to argue about it.

Big Yummy

QuoteOK.  Thanks for your thoughts.  Have a nice day

The point I intended to make was that other things count besides music: Looks, poise, personality, media manipulation, networking, management, etc.  With enough of those other attributes, a person can be quite successful in the music industry (or any other) with very little directly relevant "talent" and without a very good product.  Without those peripheral attributes, a person can be brilliant at what they do and still not get far.

As for the Britney Spears type acts of this world, I see their teams as being cut from the same cloth as the teams that work for cigarette companies and junk food chains.  They often do, in fact, have great "talent",  but their products are still garbage.  In fact, the more brains these people have, the more reprehensible their conduct is.

The best product seldom dominates any market, and the best music seldom tops the charts.

So, no, it isn't "all about the music".  There's much more to it than that.

onuspro

My 2 cents on the big vs. small:  I have 2 kits, one an 8-piece double bass monster, the other a cheapo 5 piece w/double pedal.  The big kit sits in the band's practice space.  The small kit sits in my house and is transported to gigs that are too small for the big kit.  I play power-prog-thrash metal on both.  My point being: when they put their mind to it, one can do anything on any kit.  Bonham still sounded like Bonham on a little Ludwig jazz kit.  I don't believe one size is superior to the other.  It is true that less is more, but more ain't bad either.  What I can't stand is seeing a 20 piece drumkit on a stage, and the guy barely touches a third of it.

True story:  Last show I went to, a dude has 2 bass drums, with a double pedal attached to the primary.  Nothing attached to the secondary except the hihat stand.  I asked him why.  He said because it looks cool.  Whatever floats your boat, brother.

Rylie

Quote from: onuspro on April 15, 2006, 12:32 PM
My 2 cents on the big vs. small:  I have 2 kits, one an 8-piece double bass monster, the other a cheapo 5 piece w/double pedal.  The big kit sits in the band's practice space.  The small kit sits in my house and is transported to gigs that are too small for the big kit.  I play power-prog-thrash metal on both.  My point being: when they put their mind to it, one can do anything on any kit.  Bonham still sounded like Bonham on a little Ludwig jazz kit.  I don't believe one size is superior to the other.  It is true that less is more, but more ain't bad either.  What I can't stand is seeing a 20 piece drumkit on a stage, and the guy barely touches a third of it.

True story:  Last show I went to, a dude has 2 bass drums, with a double pedal attached to the primary.  Nothing attached to the secondary except the hihat stand.  I asked him why.  He said because it looks cool.  Whatever floats your boat, brother.

Agreed. I just bought a new Mapex 6 piece fusion set last Thursday, jammed with it that night - and I'm finding definite benefits to both. I'm still amazed though what some drummers can get out of so few drums...like you said, and I do like the aesthetics of the minimal rig regardless of application.

chillman4130

Warren I must say I am very disappointed. Six pieces? A little pompous now, aren't we? You've sold out, man.

Nah I'm just messing with you. Congrats on your new kit. It's lovely. Actually I'd love to have a 6 or 7 piece to practice with, but I'd never lug it to a gig.

Speaking of gig, I hope to see you in Gainesville on the 20th. It's going to be a wayyy-above average show.

Rylie

When the time comes (when I'm gig-worthy), only 4 pieces are being transported, trust me. I just got a good deal on the Mapex's and besides, just because there's 6 drums in the set doesn't mean they all have to get mounted!

The 8" hanging tom mount (off of the straight cymbal stand) will work perfectly to set it up as a cool 4 piece with a free standing bass, or I could just leave the 10" off the bass drum mount although that may look funky. I bet by the end of the week, I've tried every conceivable arrangement, though.

Thanks, and I hope to see you there. If I make it, I'll be sure to introduce my wife so she believes me that my internet time is spent "constructively".


paul

If you like playing a 6 piece set, take the whole thing to the gig.  Don't let non-musical issues decide what kit gets used.

I have 4-, 5-, and 7-piece setups.  Given enough space on stage, I take the 7-piece.  The last couple of weeks I've been able to use it with my big band for the first time in almost a year, and doing so has been almost epiphanic.

That said, I also enjoy the smaller setups, and enjoy playing no matter which setup I take to the gig.  I just find that the larger rig offers possibilities that really open up my playing.

There is no "perfect" drumset.  I've had guys in my rock band tell me the snare/bass/ride/hats set I take to rehearsals sounds like a full set, and I've had morons ask how I can play jazz on a 9-piece set.

If you're most comfortable on a 4-piece, great.  That doesn't mean that others are uncomfortable on a different rig, or that your desired configuration has some intrinsic superiority to others.

One great thing about playing drumset is that we truly get to define our instrument in ways that other musicians can only dream about.  I've seen drummers perform terrifically on a snare and ride alone, and on a monster set with more than 20 toms.  They both worked very well under the hands of really good drummers.

Mark Counts

I don't know about all this.  To be versitile in all kinds of music and I would rather be called a percussionist than a drummer.
I have 9 drums including my kick drum and 15 cymbals and a wood block, chimes and a cow bell and a tamborine to mount on the Hi Hat.  The only thing I don't like about it is transporting it all.
I don't have a problem reaching any of it.  I have found practical uses for all of it.  I guess each to his or her own but I like it.
                                              Nutty

TnT

love playing on 4 peices, have for so long.

But I always thought it'd be a gas to scare my band one night and show up with like 16 clear octobans just for poops and giggles.